INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy on smear layer removal of 4 decalcifying agents: 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 20% citric acid, BioPure MTAD, and SmearClear. METHODS: Forty-five single-rooted human teeth were used and prepared up to ProTaper F3. After each instrumentation, 1 mL of 3% NaOCl at 60°C was irrigated for 1 minute. All the samples were randomly divided into 5 groups according to the final irrigants: 17% EDTA, 20% citric acid, BioPure MTAD, SmearClear, and 3% NaOCl (control). The smear layer removal of all groups at the apical, middle, and coronal thirds was observed under the thermal field emission scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: The EDTA group was significantly more effective than the SmearClear and MTAD groups (P < .05). The efficacy of all three thirds in the EDTA, MTAD, and SmearClear groups can be arranged as coronal, middle, and apical thirds (P < .05) from excellent to poor. However, in the citric acid group, the coronal two thirds were significantly better than the apical third (P < .05), and there was no statistical significance between the coronal and middle thirds (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The 4 decalcifying agents could effectively, but not completely, remove the smear layer, especially in the apical third. The efficacy of 17% EDTA was better than that of MTAD and SmearClear. Copyright Â
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy on smear layer removal of 4 decalcifying agents: 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 20% citric acid, BioPure MTAD, and SmearClear. METHODS: Forty-five single-rooted human teeth were used and prepared up to ProTaper F3. After each instrumentation, 1 mL of 3% NaOCl at 60°C was irrigated for 1 minute. All the samples were randomly divided into 5 groups according to the final irrigants: 17% EDTA, 20% citric acid, BioPure MTAD, SmearClear, and 3% NaOCl (control). The smear layer removal of all groups at the apical, middle, and coronal thirds was observed under the thermal field emission scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: The EDTA group was significantly more effective than the SmearClear and MTAD groups (P < .05). The efficacy of all three thirds in the EDTA, MTAD, and SmearClear groups can be arranged as coronal, middle, and apical thirds (P < .05) from excellent to poor. However, in the citric acid group, the coronal two thirds were significantly better than the apical third (P < .05), and there was no statistical significance between the coronal and middle thirds (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The 4 decalcifying agents could effectively, but not completely, remove the smear layer, especially in the apical third. The efficacy of 17% EDTA was better than that of MTAD and SmearClear. Copyright Â
Authors: Alexander Pompermayer Jardine; Ricardo Abreu da Rosa; Manuela Favarin Santini; Márcia Wagner; Marcus Vinícius Reis Só; Milton Carlos Kuga; Jefferson Ricardo Pereira; Patrícia Maria Poli Kopper Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Ranya Elsayed; Pheba Abraham; Mohamed E Awad; Zoya Kurago; Balasudha Baladhandayutham; Gary M Whitford; David H Pashley; Charles E McKenna; Mohammed E Elsalanty Journal: Bone Date: 2018-02-09 Impact factor: 4.398