Literature DB >> 22339233

Epidemiologic and laboratory findings from 3 years of testing United States blood donors for Trypanosoma cruzi.

Brian Custer1, Maria Agapova, Roberta Bruhn, Robin Cusick, Hany Kamel, Peter Tomasulo, Hope Biswas, Leslie Tobler, Tzong-Hae Lee, Sally Caglioti, Michael Busch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: At most blood centers in the United States routine testing of donations for Trypanosoma cruzi using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is followed by supplemental testing by radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA). The objective of this study was to report the results of routine testing and risk factor data from allogeneic blood donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: T. cruzi testing data from January 2007 through December 2009 were analyzed, and risk factor interviews and follow-up studies were conducted on seroreactive donors. Prevalences of confirmed infection and risk factors associated with infection were assessed using logistic and multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS: Of 2,940,491 allogeneic donations from 1,183,076 donors, 305 (0.01% per donation tested and 0.026% per blood donor) were repeat reactive (RR) and 89 of those were confirmed positive by RIPA, yielding an overall seroprevalence of 1 per 33,039 donations and 1 per 13,292 donors. Country of birth and US blood center location differences in the seroprevalence of T. cruzi were evident. The odds of confirmed infection were highest if the donor reported having been bitten by the reduviid (kissing) bug (odds ratio [OR], 76.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11.1-3173) followed by having lived in a rural area of Latin America (OR, 38.6; 95% CI, 15.1-102.5). In multivariable analyses, having spent 3 months or more in Mexico or Central and/or South America was associated with the highest odds of RIPA-confirmed infection (OR, 8.5; 95% CI, 2.7-26.5). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of ELISA RR donors exhibited low sensitivity (1/22 [4%] RIPA-confirmed donors was PCR positive).
CONCLUSION: Risk factors for confirmed infection in US blood donors are consistent with the known epidemiology of Chagas disease. Blood donors or transfusions do not substantially contribute to the burden of T. cruzi infection in the United States.
© 2012 American Association of Blood Banks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22339233     DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03569.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  14 in total

1.  Chagas disease: are we there yet?

Authors:  Benjamin A Zaniello
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Surveillance of Chagas disease among at-risk blood donors in Italy: preliminary results from Umberto I Polyclinic in Rome.

Authors:  Simona Gabrielli; Gabriella Girelli; Francesco Vaia; Mariella Santonicola; Azis Fakeri; Gabriella Cancrini
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Evidence of autochthonous Chagas disease in southeastern Texas.

Authors:  Melissa N Garcia; David Aguilar; Rodion Gorchakov; Susan N Rossmann; Susan P Montgomery; Hilda Rivera; Laila Woc-Colburn; Peter J Hotez; Kristy O Murray
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  Antibody levels correlate with detection of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA by sensitive polymerase chain reaction assays in seropositive blood donors and possible resolution of infection over time.

Authors:  Ester C Sabino; Tzong-Hae Lee; Lani Montalvo; Megan L Nguyen; David A Leiby; Danielle M Carrick; Marcia M Otani; Elizabeth Vinelli; David Wright; Susan L Stramer; Michael Busch
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 5.  A global systematic review of Chagas disease prevalence among migrants.

Authors:  Erin E Conners; Joseph M Vinetz; John R Weeks; Kimberly C Brouwer
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.112

6.  Ten-year incidence of Chagas cardiomyopathy among asymptomatic Trypanosoma cruzi-seropositive former blood donors.

Authors:  Ester C Sabino; Antonio L Ribeiro; Vera M C Salemi; Claudia Di Lorenzo Oliveira; Andre P Antunes; Marcia M Menezes; Barbara M Ianni; Luciano Nastari; Fabio Fernandes; Giuseppina M Patavino; Vandana Sachdev; Ligia Capuani; Cesar de Almeida-Neto; Danielle M Carrick; David Wright; Katherine Kavounis; Thelma T Goncalez; Anna Barbara Carneiro-Proietti; Brian Custer; Michael P Busch; Edward L Murphy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Prevalence of Chagas Disease in the Latin American-born Population of Los Angeles.

Authors:  Sheba K Meymandi; Colin J Forsyth; Jonathan Soverow; Salvador Hernandez; Daniel Sanchez; Susan P Montgomery; Mahmoud Traina
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Chagas Disease Infection among Migrants at the Mexico/Guatemala Border.

Authors:  Erin E Conners; Teresa López Ordoñez; Celia Cordon-Rosales; Carmen Fernández Casanueva; Sonia Morales Miranda; Kimberly C Brouwer
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 9.  Historical Perspectives on the Epidemiology of Human Chagas Disease in Texas and Recommendations for Enhanced Understanding of Clinical Chagas Disease in the Southern United States.

Authors:  Melissa N Garcia; Laila Woc-Colburn; David Aguilar; Peter J Hotez; Kristy O Murray
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2015-11-05

10.  Risk Factors and Screening for Trypanosoma cruzi Infection of Dutch Blood Donors.

Authors:  Ed Slot; Boris M Hogema; Michel Molier; Aldert Bart; Hans L Zaaijer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.