Literature DB >> 22339103

Heart rate variability biofeedback decreases blood pressure in prehypertensive subjects by improving autonomic function and baroreflex.

Guiping Lin1, Qiuling Xiang, Xiaodong Fu, Shuzhen Wang, Sheng Wang, Sijuan Chen, Li Shao, Yan Zhao, Tinghuai Wang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Individuals with prehypertension are at risk of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases, and yet efficient interventions are lagging behind. Studies indicate that heart rate variability-biofeedback (HRV-BF) increases HRV and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) as well as reduces related pathological symptoms, suggesting potentially beneficial effects of HRV-BF on prehypertension, but little is known about these effects. In this study, these effects were investigated and their mechanisms were explored.
OBJECTIVES: The effect of HRV-BF on prehypertension in young adults and its potential mechanism were explored.
DESIGN: Forty-three (43) individuals with prehypertension were recruited and classified into three categories: HRV-BF group, slow abdominal breathing group, and control group. All groups were assessed with measurements of noninvasive blood pressure (BP), BRS, respiration, and galvanic skin response (GSR) at pre-intervention, in the entire process of each session, at postintervention, as well as at a 3-month follow-up.
INTERVENTIONS: Subjects participated in a 10-session HRV-BF protocol or simple slow abdominal breathing protocol conducted over 5 weeks. A 3-month follow-up was also performed on these individuals.
RESULTS: The incidence of prehypertension was as high as 14.5% in young college students. Individuals with prehypertension were lower in BRS (7.5±5.2 ms/mm Hg) and HRV (log10-transformed of the standard deviation of normal-to-normal beats [SDNN]=1.62±0.13 ms, lgTotal power of spectral density in the range of frequencies between 0 and 0.4Hz (TP)=8.02±0.55 ms2) than those with normal blood pressure (BRS=18.4±7.4 ms/mm Hg, lgSDNN=1.79±0.10 ms, lgTP=8.68±0.85 ms2). HRV-BF reduced blood pressure (from 131.7±8.7/79.3±4.7 mm Hg to 118.9±7.3 mm Hg/71.9±4.9 mm Hg, p<0.01), increased BRS (from 7.0±5.9 ms/mm Hg to 15.8±5.3 ms/mm Hg, p<0.01) and increased HRV (lgSDNN from 1.61±0.11 to 1.75±0.05 ms, and lgTP from 8.07±0.54 to 9.08±0.41 ms2, p<0.01). These effects were more obvious than those of the slow-breathing group, and remained for at least 3 months. HRV-BF also significantly increased vagus-associated HRV indices and decreased GSR (indices of sympathetic tone).
CONCLUSIONS: These effects suggest that HRV-BF, a novel behavioral neurocardiac intervention, could enhance BRS, improve the cardiac autonomic tone, and facilitate BP adjustment for individuals with prehypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22339103     DOI: 10.1089/acm.2010.0607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Altern Complement Med        ISSN: 1075-5535            Impact factor:   2.579


  33 in total

1.  A computational physiology approach to personalized treatment models: the beneficial effects of slow breathing on the human cardiovascular system.

Authors:  Maria Fonoberova; Igor Mezić; Jennifer F Buckman; Vladimir A Fonoberov; Adriana Mezić; Evgeny G Vaschillo; Eun-Young Mun; Bronya Vaschillo; Marsha E Bates
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Effects of heart rate variability biofeedback on cardiovascular responses and autonomic sympathovagal modulation following stressor tasks in prehypertensives.

Authors:  S Chen; P Sun; S Wang; G Lin; T Wang
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 3.  Current Evidence on Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback as a Complementary Anticraving Intervention.

Authors:  Nour Alayan; Lucille Eller; Marsha E Bates; Dennis P Carmody
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 2.579

4.  Associations of depression severity with heart rate and heart rate variability in young adults across normative and clinical populations.

Authors:  Laura M Lesnewich; Fiona N Conway; Jennifer F Buckman; Christopher J Brush; Peter J Ehmann; David Eddie; Ryan L Olson; Brandon L Alderman; Marsha E Bates
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 5.  Contribution of Baroreceptor Function to Pain Perception and Perioperative Outcomes.

Authors:  Heberto Suarez-Roca; Rebecca Y Klinger; Mihai V Podgoreanu; Ru-Rong Ji; Martin I Sigurdsson; Nathan Waldron; Joseph P Mathew; William Maixner
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Heart rate variability biofeedback: Theoretical basis, delivery, and its potential for the treatment of substance use disorders.

Authors:  David Eddie; Evgeny Vaschillo; Bronya Vaschillo; Paul Lehrer
Journal:  Addict Res Theory       Date:  2015-02-17

Review 7.  Role of Paced Breathing for Treatment of Hypertension.

Authors:  Relu Cernes; Reuven Zimlichman
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 8.  Central modulation of cyclosporine-induced hypertension.

Authors:  Hanan M El-Gowelli; Mahmoud M El-Mas
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 3.000

9.  Meditation smartphone application effects on prehypertensive adults' blood pressure: Dose-response feasibility trial.

Authors:  Zachary W Adams; John C Sieverdes; Brenda Brunner-Jackson; Martina Mueller; Jessica Chandler; Vanessa Diaz; Sachin Patel; Luke R Sox; Spencer Wilder; Frank A Treiber
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 4.267

10.  Protective effect of metoprolol on arrhythmia and heart rate variability in healthy people with 24 hours of sleep deprivation.

Authors:  Wei-ren Chen; Xiang-min Shi; Ting-shu Yang; Li-chao Zhao; Ling-geng Gao
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.