Literature DB >> 22338807

Delphi research: issues raised by a pilot study.

Nicola Clibbens1, Stephen Walters, Wendy Baird.   

Abstract

AIM: This paper will explore the issues raised by the pilot stage of a three-round Delphi study.
BACKGROUND: The Delphi method involves a range of complex activity for the expert panellists and the researcher and yet there is a lack of debate in the academic literature about how Delphi research should be piloted. DATA SOURCES: A Delphi study aimed at establishing areas of agreement between service users and registered nurses about therapeutic nursing on acute mental health wards. A pilot Delphi study tested the first-round questions, the use of two measurement approaches and the process of analysis and administration across three rounds. REVIEW
METHODS: A brief review of published Delphi pilot studies in health care between 2001 and 2011; ten of 25 relevant papers are included here. DISCUSSION: Approaches to pilot tests for the Delphi method are discussed.
CONCLUSION: Delphi researchers should publish greater detail about their approach to pilot studies. Pilot Delphi studies can support the development of first round questions but also offer a means to test measurement methods and define consensus in subsequent rounds. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH/PRACTICE: Pilot studies in Delphi research provide useful guidance about first-round questions as well as measurement methods, consensus thresholds and controlled feedback in subsequent rounds. They support the involvement of professionals and service users and they need to trial the recruitment strategy to avoid between-round delays. Delphi researchers should publish details of their approach to pilot studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22338807     DOI: 10.7748/cnp.v1.i7.pg21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurse Res        ISSN: 1351-5578


  7 in total

1.  Expert opinion on the UK standard of care for haemophilia patients with inhibitors: a modified Delphi consensus study.

Authors:  Kate Khair; Elizabeth Chalmers; Thuvia Flannery; Annabel Griffiths; Felicity Rowley; Guillermo Tobaruela; Pratima Chowdary
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2021-04-30

2.  Development of an Index of Engagement in HIV Care: An Adapted Internet-Based Delphi Process.

Authors:  Mallory O Johnson; Kimberly A Koester; Troy Wood; Torsten B Neilands; Jamie L Pomeranz; Katerina A Christopoulos
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-12-05

3.  Working towards consensus on methods used to elicit participant-reported safety data in uncomplicated malaria clinical drug studies: a Delphi technique study.

Authors:  Nyaradzo Mandimika; Karen I Barnes; Clare I R Chandler; Cheryl Pace; Elizabeth N Allen
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 2.979

4.  Expert Consensus on a Proposed Study Framework to Explore Factors Influencing Plasmodium knowlesi Malaria Preventive Behavior: A Modified Delphi Method Protocol.

Authors:  Nurul Athirah Naserrudin; Rozita Hod; Mohammad Saffree Jeffree; Kamruddin Ahmed; Mohd Rohaizat Hassan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  A comprehensive mobility discharge assessment framework for older adults transitioning from hospital-to-home in the community-What mobility factors are critical to include? Protocol for an international e-Delphi study.

Authors:  Michael E Kalu; Vanina Dal Bello-Haas; Meridith Griffin; Jenny Ploeg; Julie Richardson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Evaluation of upper extremity neurorehabilitation using technology: a European Delphi consensus study within the EU COST Action Network on Robotics for Neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Ann-Marie Hughes; Sofia Barbosa Bouças; Jane H Burridge; Margit Alt Murphy; Jaap Buurke; Peter Feys; Verena Klamroth-Marganska; Ilse Lamers; Gerdienke Prange-Lasonder; Annick Timmermans; Thierry Keller
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Practical Considerations in Using Online Modified-Delphi Approaches to Engage Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Practice Guideline Development.

Authors:  Dmitry Khodyakov; Sean Grant; Brian Denger; Kathi Kinnett; Ann Martin; Holly Peay; Ian Coulter
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.883

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.