Literature DB >> 22337499

Patient Reactions to Vital Sign Measures: Comparing Home Monitoring Technology to Face-to-Face Delivery.

Kimberly Shea1, Breanna Chamoff.   

Abstract

Increasingly home health agencies are using home-based technologies to monitor vital signs of chronically ill patients. Patients receive measurements such as blood pressure and weight that indicate risks to their health. Cognitive reactions to risk measures have been studied for face-to-face delivery; however, it is unknown whether the same reactions exist with technology delivery. Reported in this article are study results of a comparative content expert analysis of reactions to technology-delivered health-risk measures. Results suggest that patients have the similar reactions but may be more likely to just accept, without evaluating or considering threats to their health. As home telemonitoring applications continue to evolve, care must be taken avoid creating passive patients and develop best practices that use technology to encourage beneficial self-care behaviors.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22337499      PMCID: PMC3277839          DOI: 10.1177/1084822311411565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Home Health Care Manag Pract        ISSN: 1084-8223


  9 in total

1.  Biased reasoning: adaptive responses to health risk feedback.

Authors:  Britta Renner
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-03

2.  Eyes on the prize or nose to the grindstone? The effects of level of goal evaluation on mood and motivation.

Authors:  Linda Houser-Marko; Kennon M Sheldon
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-07-28

3.  Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Biased appraisal of high blood pressure.

Authors:  R T Croyle
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  To be or not to be at risk: spontaneous reactions to risk information.

Authors:  Martina Panzer; Britta Renner
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2008

6.  Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care.

Authors:  Thomas Bodenheimer; Kate Lorig; Halsted Holman; Kevin Grumbach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  How well do people recall risk factor test results? Accuracy and bias among cholesterol screening participants.

Authors:  Robert T Croyle; Elizabeth F Loftus; Steven D Barger; Yi-Chun Sun; Marybeth Hart; JoAnn Gettig
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 8.  Systematic review of home telemonitoring for chronic diseases: the evidence base.

Authors:  Guy Paré; Mirou Jaana; Claude Sicotte
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Spontaneous skepticism: the interplay of motivation and expectation in responses to favorable and unfavorable medical diagnoses.

Authors:  Peter H Ditto; Geoffrey D Munro; Anne M Apanovitch; James A Scepansky; Lisa K Lockhart
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2003-09
  9 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  The role of telemedicine in hypertension management: focus on blood pressure telemonitoring.

Authors:  Stefano Omboni; Rossella Ferrari
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  'Pushed' self-tracking using digital technologies for chronic health condition management: a critical interpretive synthesis.

Authors:  Heather Morgan
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2016-11-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.