Literature DB >> 2233749

Tissue specificity of the hormonal response in sex accessory tissues is associated with nuclear matrix protein patterns.

R H Getzenberg1, D S Coffey.   

Abstract

The DNA of interphase nuclei have very specific three-dimensional organizations that are different in different cell types, and it is possible that this varying DNA organization is responsible for the tissue specificity of gene expression. The nuclear matrix organizes the three-dimensional structure of the DNA and is believed to be involved in the control of gene expression. This study compares the nuclear structural proteins between two sex accessory tissues in the same animal responding to the same androgen stimulation by the differential expression of major tissue-specific secretory proteins. We demonstrate here that the nuclear matrix is tissue specific in the rat ventral prostate and seminal vesicle, and undergoes characteristic alterations in its protein composition upon androgen withdrawal. Three types of nuclear matrix proteins were observed: 1) nuclear matrix proteins that are different and tissue specific in the rat ventral prostate and seminal vesicle, 2) a set of nuclear matrix proteins that either appear or disappear upon androgen withdrawal, and 3) a set of proteins that are common to both the ventral prostate and seminal vesicle and do not change with the hormonal state of the animal. Since the nuclear matrix is known to bind androgen receptors in a tissue- and steroid-specific manner, we propose that the tissue specificity of the nuclear matrix arranges the DNA in a unique conformation, which may be involved in the specific interaction of transcription factors with DNA sequences, resulting in tissue-specific patterns of secretory protein expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2233749     DOI: 10.1210/mend-4-9-1336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Endocrinol        ISSN: 0888-8809


  8 in total

1.  ATP-dependent release of glucocorticoid receptors from the nuclear matrix.

Authors:  Y Tang; D B DeFranco
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Ten unanswered questions in cancer: "If this is true, what does it imply"?

Authors:  Sarah R Amend; Amber E de Groot; Gonzalo Torga; Haley D Axelrod; Diane K Reyes; Kenneth C Valkenburg; Stephanie A Glavaris; Kenneth J Pienta
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2018-04-01

Review 3.  Rethinking cell structure.

Authors:  S Penman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Interaction of the tau2 transcriptional activation domain of glucocorticoid receptor with a novel steroid receptor coactivator, Hic-5, which localizes to both focal adhesions and the nuclear matrix.

Authors:  L Yang; J Guerrero; H Hong; D B DeFranco; M R Stallcup
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 5.  Spinal cord compression in prostate cancer.

Authors:  J L Osborn; R H Getzenberg; D L Trump
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Nuclear matrix proteins in human colon cancer.

Authors:  S K Keesee; M D Meneghini; R P Szaro; Y J Wu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  The dynamic architectural and epigenetic nuclear landscape: developing the genomic almanac of biology and disease.

Authors:  Phillip W L Tai; Sayyed K Zaidi; Hai Wu; Rodrigo A Grandy; Martin Montecino; André J van Wijnen; Jane B Lian; Gary S Stein; Janet L Stein
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.384

8.  Characterization of SAF-A, a novel nuclear DNA binding protein from HeLa cells with high affinity for nuclear matrix/scaffold attachment DNA elements.

Authors:  H Romig; F O Fackelmayer; A Renz; U Ramsperger; A Richter
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.598

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.