Literature DB >> 22337483

Femoral head lag screw position for cephalomedullary nails: a biomechanical analysis.

Paul R T Kuzyk1, Rad Zdero, Suraj Shah, Michael Olsen, James P Waddell, Emil H Schemitsch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine if lag screw position affects the biomechanical properties of a cephalomedullary nail used to fix an unstable peritrochanteric fracture.
METHODS: Unstable peritrochanteric fractures were created in 30 synthetic femurs and repaired with Long Gamma 3 Nails using one of 5 lag screw positions: superior, inferior, anterior, posterior, or central. Radiographic measurements including tip-apex distance and a calcar referenced tip-apex distance were calculated from anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. Specimens were tested for axial, lateral bending, and torsional stiffness and then loaded to failure in the axial position. Analysis of variance and linear regression were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The inferior lag screw position had significantly greater mean axial stiffness than superior (P < 0.01), anterior (P = 0.02), and posterior (P = 0.04) positions. Analysis revealed significantly less mean torsional stiffness for the superior lag screw position compared with other lag screw positions (P < 0.01 all 4 pairings). No statistical differences were noted for lateral bending stiffness. Superior and central lag screw positions had significantly greater mean load-to-failure than anterior (P < 0.01 and P = 0.02) and posterior (P < 0.01 and P = 0.05) positions. There were significant negative linear correlations between stiffness with distance from the calcar on anteroposterior radiographs and load-to-failure with distance from the center of femoral neck on the lateral radiographs.
CONCLUSIONS: The inferior lag screw position produced the highest axial and torsional stiffness. Anterior and posterior lag screw positions produced the lowest stiffnesses and load-to-failure. Inferior placement of the lag screw on the anteroposterior radiograph and central placement on the lateral radiographs is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22337483     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318229acca

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  30 in total

1.  Cephalomedullary fixation for intertrochanteric fractures: an operative technical tip.

Authors:  Lin Jin; Liping Zhang; Zhiyong Hou; Wei Chen; Pengcheng Wang; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-03-22

2.  Is tip apex distance as important as we think? A biomechanical study examining optimal lag screw placement.

Authors:  Patrick Kane; Bryan Vopat; Wendell Heard; Nikhil Thakur; David Paller; Sarath Koruprolu; Christopher Born
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Is rotation the mode of failure in pertrochanteric fractures fixed with nails? Theoretical approach and illustrative cases.

Authors:  C Kokoroghiannis; D Vasilakos; K Zisis; G Dimitriou; E Pappa; D Evangelopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-09-20

4.  Clinical outcomes of dynamic hip screw fixation of intertrochanteric fractures: comparison with additional anti-rotation screw use.

Authors:  Chul-Ho Kim; Jae Suk Chang; Ji Wan Kim
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-03-07

5.  Predictors of failure following fixation of intertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation.

Authors:  Raghavan Raghuraman; Jia Wen Kam; David Thai Chong Chua
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.858

6.  Avoiding malalignment in proximal femur fractures treated with newer generation cephalomedullary nails: Some technical tips.

Authors:  Arvind Kumar; Samarth Mittal; Aditya Jain; Vivek Trikha
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-11-23

7.  How evolution of the nailing system improves results and reduces orthopedic complications: more than 2000 cases of trochanteric fractures treated with the Gamma Nail System.

Authors:  R Pascarella; R Fantasia; A Maresca; C Bettuzzi; L Amendola; S Violini; F Cuoghi; P Sangiovanni; S Cerbasi; S Boriani; D S Tigani
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2015-12-14

Review 8.  Strategies for managing the destruction of calcar femorale.

Authors:  Jin Mei; Lili Pang; Zhongchao Jiang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  [Comparison of the predictive value of tip-apex distance and calcar referenced tip-apex distance in treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures with Asian type proximal femoral nail fixation].

Authors:  Yuwei Cai; Juntao Feng; Yu Chen; Meng Shi; Zhongxiang Yu; Lei Fang; Lin Zhou; Shengming Xu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-11-15

10.  [Effect of screw blade position on proximal femoral nail anti-rotation internal fixation for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly].

Authors:  Jinyuan Zeng; Junjian Ye; Yun Xie; Chunyong Chen; Zhangxiong Lin
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.