Literature DB >> 22337417

Biomaterials and biologics in craniofacial reconstruction.

Thomas Engstrand1.   

Abstract

Complications related to surgery, including infection, wound dehiscence, and implant protrusion, are costly and may cause severe morbidity to patients. The choice of implants materials is critical for a successful outcome, particularly in craniofacial reconstructions. This review discusses the potential benefits and drawbacks of biologically active materials used for craniofacial bone repair as alternatives to inert implant prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22337417     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318241c0f4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  2 in total

1.  Three years after transplants in human mandibles, histological and in-line holotomography revealed that stem cells regenerated a compact rather than a spongy bone: biological and clinical implications.

Authors:  Alessandra Giuliani; Adrian Manescu; Max Langer; Franco Rustichelli; Vincenzo Desiderio; Francesca Paino; Alfredo De Rosa; Luigi Laino; Riccardo d'Aquino; Virginia Tirino; Gianpaolo Papaccio
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 6.940

2.  Impact of non-thermal plasma surface modification on porous calcium hydroxyapatite ceramics for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Yu Moriguchi; Dae-Sung Lee; Ryota Chijimatsu; Khair Thamina; Kazuto Masuda; Dai Itsuki; Hideki Yoshikawa; Satoshi Hamaguchi; Akira Myoui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.