| Literature DB >> 22337140 |
Wei Wang1, Suyun Xiang, Shaofei Xie, Bingren Xiang.
Abstract
Based on the theory of stochastic resonance, an adaptive single-well stochastic resonance (ASSR) coupled with genetic algorithm was developed to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio of weak chromatographic signals. In conventional stochastic resonance algorithm, there are two or more parameters needed to be optimized and the proper parameters values were obtained by a universal searching within a given range. In the developed ASSR, the optimization of system parameter was simplified and automatic implemented. The ASSR was applied to the trace analysis of clenbuterol in human urine and it helped to significantly improve the limit of detection and limit of quantification of clenbuterol. Good linearity, precision and accuracy of the proposed method ensure that it could be an effective tool for trace analysis and the improvement of detective sensibility of current detectors.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22337140 PMCID: PMC6268344 DOI: 10.3390/molecules17021929
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1A typical single-well potential.
Figure 2Chromatogram of urine spiked with clenbuterol at 0.025 ng/mL. (a) Full length of the chromatogram. (b) Especially enlarged chromatogram of clenbuterol. (c) The peak of clenbuterol obtained by ASSR with b = 0.0574.
Figure 3Chromatograms of clebuterol in urine samples of calibration curve. (a) The raw chromatograms of clenbuterol. (b) The chromatograms of clenbuterol obtained by ASSR with b = 0.0574. From left to right, the concentrations of clenbuterol are 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0 and 20.0 ng/mL, respectively.
Calibration curve of clenbuterol by ASSR.
| Conc. (ng/mL) | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ratio( | 0.243 | 0.465 | 0.917 | 1.689 | 3.311 | 6.918 | 14.716 |
| Calibration Curve | |||||||
Acurracy and precision of clenbuterol by ASSR.
| Added Conc. | Intra-day assay | Inter-day assay | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured Conc. | Precision | Accuracy | Measured Conc. | Precision | Accuracy | |
| (ng/mL) | (mean ± S.D.) (ng/mL) | R.S.D (%) | (%) | (mean ± S.D.) (ng/mL) | R.S.D (%) | (%) |
| 0.5 | 0.55 ± 0.04 | 7.6 | 109.5 | 0.56 ± 0.05 | 8.7 | 111.9 |
| 2.0 | 2.07 ± 0.12 | 5.8 | 103.5 | 1.87 ± 0.14 | 7.3 | 93.4 |
| 10.0 | 9.60 ± 0.53 | 5.5 | 96.0 | 9.87 ± 0.55 | 5.6 | 98.7 |