Literature DB >> 22336844

Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Marcello Di Nisio1, Ettore Porreca, Noemi Ferrante, Hans-Martin Otten, Franco Cuccurullo, Anne W S Rutjes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) often complicates the clinical course of cancer disease. The risk is further increased by chemotherapy but the safety and efficacy of primary thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients treated with chemotherapy is uncertain.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of primary thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. SEARCH
METHODS: The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group searched their Specialised Register (last searched 3 May 2011) and CENTRAL (2011, Issue 2). The authors searched clinical trials registries and reference lists of relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), vitamin K antagonists (VKA), direct thrombin inhibitors, direct factor Xa inhibitors or mechanical intervention to no intervention or placebo; or comparing two different anticoagulants. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted on methodological quality, patients, interventions and outcomes including symptomatic VTE and major bleeding as the primary effectiveness and safety outcomes, respectively. MAIN
RESULTS: Nine RCTs with a total of 3538 patients were considered. None of the RCTs tested UFH, fondaparinux, direct factor Xa inhibitors or mechanical interventions. Overall, the risk of bias was low in most of the studies. LMWH, when compared with inactive control, significantly reduced the incidence of symptomatic VTE (risk ratio (RR) 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41 to 0.93) with no evidence of heterogeneity (I(2) = 0%). The number needed to treat to prevent a symptomatic VTE was 60. LMWH was associated with a 60% increase in major bleeding when compared with inactive control, although this was not statistically significant (RR 1.57, 95% CI 0.69 to 3.60; I(2) = 10%). There was a 45% reduction in overall VTE (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.88; I(2) = 0%) while for symptomatic pulmonary embolism, asymptomatic VTE, minor bleeding and one-year mortality the differences between the LMWH and control groups were not statistically significant. The effect of the vitamin K antagonist warfarin on preventing symptomatic VTE, measured in only one study, was not statistically significant (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.20). In one RCT of patients with myeloma, LMWH was associated with a 67% reduction in symptomatic VTE (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.83) compared with warfarin, with no differences in major bleeding. Antithrombin, evaluated in one study on paediatric patients, had no significant effect on VTE nor major bleeding when compared with inactive control. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Primary thromboprophylaxis with LMWH significantly reduced the incidence of symptomatic VTE in ambulatory cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. However, the lack of power hampers definite conclusions on the effects on major safety outcomes, which mandates additional studies to determine the risk to benefit ratio of LMWH in this setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22336844     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008500.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  20 in total

Review 1.  Clinical use and the Italian demand for antithrombin.

Authors:  Giancarlo M Liumbruno; Massimo Franchini; Monica Lanzoni; Fabio Candura; Stefania Vaglio; Samantha Profili; Liviana Catalano; Giuseppina Facco; Simonetta Pupella; Gabriele Calizzani; Giuliano Grazzini
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  [Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer treated with cisplatin: A systematic review and meta-analysis].

Authors:  M Wilhelm
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 3.  Primary venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with solid tumors: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Minh Phan; Sonia John; Ana I Casanegra; Suman Rathbun; Aaron Mansfield; Julie A Stoner; Alfonso J Tafur
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Outpatient thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin in solid tumors: Where do we stand today?

Authors:  Thein Hlaing Oo
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Thromboembolic disease in patients with high-grade glioma.

Authors:  James R Perry
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 6.  Safety and efficacy of primary thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients.

Authors:  I García Escobar; M Antonio Rebollo; S García Adrián; A Rodríguez-Garzotto; A Muñoz Martín
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  [Prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients. Clinical value of low-molecular-weight heparins].

Authors:  S Kreher; H Riess
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 8.  Treatment for superficial infusion thrombophlebitis of the upper extremity.

Authors:  Marcello Di Nisio; Frank Peinemann; Ettore Porreca; Anne W S Rutjes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-20

Review 9.  Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Authors:  Marcello Di Nisio; Ettore Porreca; Matteo Candeloro; Michele De Tursi; Ilaria Russi; Anne Ws Rutjes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-01

Review 10.  Heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients (excluding stroke and myocardial infarction).

Authors:  Raza Alikhan; Rachel Bedenis; Alexander T Cohen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-05-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.