Literature DB >> 22336104

An evaluation of the Wolf Motor Function Test in motor trials early after stroke.

Dorothy F Edwards1, Catherine E Lang, Joanne M Wagner, Rebecca Birkenmeier, Alexander W Dromerick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the internal consistency, validity, responsiveness, and advantages of the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and compare these results to the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) in participants with mild to moderate hemiparesis within the first few months after stroke.
DESIGN: Data were collected as part of the Very Early Constraint-Induced Therapy for Recovery from Stroke (VECTORS) trial, an acute, single-blind randomized controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy. Subjects were studied at baseline (day 0), after treatment (day 14), and after 90 days (day 90) poststroke.
SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation hospital; follow-up 3 months poststroke. PARTICIPANTS: Hemiparetic subjects (N=51) enrolled in the VECTORS trial. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At each time point, subjects were tested on (1) the WMFT and ARAT, (2) clinical measures of sensorimotor impairments, (3) reach and grasp movements performed in the kinematics laboratory, and (4) clinical measures of disability. Blinded raters performed all evaluations. Analyses at each time point included calculating effect size as indicators of responsiveness, and correlation analyses to examine relationships between WMFT scores and other measures.
RESULTS: The WMFT is internally consistent, valid, and responsive in the early stages of stroke recovery. Sensorimotor and kinematic measures of reach and grasp support the construct validity of the WMFT.
CONCLUSIONS: In an acute stroke population, the WMFT has acceptable reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change over time. However, when compared with the ARAT, the higher training and testing burdens may not be offset by the relatively small psychometric advantages.
Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22336104     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  12 in total

1.  Moving toward Appropriate Motor Assessment Tools in People Affected by Severe Acquired Brain Injury: A Scoping Review with Clinical Advices.

Authors:  Mirjam Bonanno; Rosaria De Luca; William Torregrossa; Paolo Tonin; Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15

2.  Wolf Motor Function Test for characterizing moderate to severe hemiparesis in stroke patients.

Authors:  Timea M Hodics; Kyle Nakatsuka; Bhim Upreti; Arun Alex; Patricia S Smith; John C Pezzullo
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Can the ARAT Be Used to Measure Arm Function in People With Cerebellar Ataxia?

Authors:  Rachel Reoli; Kendra Cherry-Allen; Amanda Therrien; Jennifer Keller; Kristan Leech; Abigail Leddy Whitt; Amy Bastian
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2021-02-04

4.  Instrumental indices for upper limb function assessment in stroke patients: a validation study.

Authors:  Maria Longhi; Andrea Merlo; Paolo Prati; Meris Giacobbi; Davide Mazzoli
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robotic upper limb therapy improves upper limb function in an adult with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Kathleen M Friel; Peter Lee; Lindsey V Soles; Ana R P Smorenburg; Hsing-Ching Kuo; Disha Gupta; Dylan J Edwards
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.138

6.  Comparison of bilateral and unilateral upper limb training in people with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pei-Ming Chen; Patrick W H Kwong; Claudia K Y Lai; Shamay S M Ng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Responsiveness and Predictive Ability of the Chinese Version of the Action Research Arm Test in People with Cerebral Infarction.

Authors:  Jiang-Li Zhao; Tao Zhang; Zhi-Qin Xu; Ming-Hui Ding; Yan Leng; Rui-Hao Bian; Yu-Rong Mao; Dong-Feng Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  A Comparative Study on the Effect of Task Specific Training on Right Versus Left Chronic Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Reem M Alwhaibi; Noha F Mahmoud; Hoda M Zakaria; Wanees M Badawy; Mahmoud Y Elzanaty; Walaa M Ragab; Maher S Benjadid; Nisreen N Al Awaji; Hager R Elserougy
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Translation and Initial Validation of the Chinese Version of the Action Research Arm Test in People with Stroke.

Authors:  Jiang-Li Zhao; Pei-Ming Chen; Wen-Feng Li; Rui-Hao Bian; Ming-Hui Ding; Hai Li; Qiang Lin; Zhi-Qin Xu; Yu-Rong Mao; Dong-Feng Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Improving Accelerometry-Based Measurement of Functional Use of the Upper Extremity After Stroke: Machine Learning Versus Counts Threshold Method.

Authors:  Peter S Lum; Liqi Shu; Elaine M Bochniewicz; Tan Tran; Lin-Ching Chang; Jessica Barth; Alexander W Dromerick
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.