Frederik Raiskup1, Roberto Pinelli, Eberhard Spoerl. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Fetscherstrasse 74, Dresden, Germany. frederik.raiskup@uniklinikum-dresden.de
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of osmolarity on the transepithelial permeability of riboflavin solutions in a cross-linking procedure. METHODS: Several riboflavin 0.1% solutions that contained different NaCl and benzalkonium chloride (BAC) concentrations were applied to 36 rabbit eyes for 30 min. To serve as a control, the epithelium was removed in group A (standard protocol). The groups then received the following solutions: (A) riboflavin 0.1% in NaCl 0.9% solution; (B) riboflavin 0.1% in NaCl 0.44% solution with BAC 0.02%; (C) riboflavin 0.1% in NaCl 0.44% solution with BAC 0.01%; (D) riboflavin 0.1% in NaCl 0.44% solution without BAC; (E) riboflavin 0.1% in NaCl 0.9% solution with BAC 0.02%; and (F) riboflavin 0.1% in NaCl 0.9% solution without BAC. Six eyes in each group were treated. The absorption coefficients of the corneas were measured to characterize the riboflavin penetration into the cornea. RESULTS: There is a large difference in the transepithelial riboflavin penetration of riboflavin 0.1% + BAC 0.02% solutions that contain different NaCl concentrations (NaCl 0.9% versus NaCl 0.44%). The absorption coefficients differed by more than a factor of two (P = 0.004). No statistically significant difference was found between riboflavin 0.1% in NaCl 0.44% solution containing BAC 0.02% and BAC 0.01%. Compared to the standard protocol, these solutions resulted in an absorption coefficient of 37% (BAC 0.02%) and 33% (BAC 0.01%) of the standard epithelium-off procedure. CONCLUSION: The transepithelial riboflavin solution should contain no dextran, but it should include 0.01% BAC and 0.44% NaCl to promote the permeability of riboflavin through the epithelium, resulting in a sufficient concentration of riboflavin in the corneal stroma.
PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of osmolarity on the transepithelial permeability of riboflavin solutions in a cross-linking procedure. METHODS: Several riboflavin 0.1% solutions that contained different NaCl and benzalkonium chloride (BAC) concentrations were applied to 36 rabbit eyes for 30 min. To serve as a control, the epithelium was removed in group A (standard protocol). The groups then received the following solutions: (A) riboflavin 0.1% in NaCl 0.9% solution; (B) riboflavin 0.1% in NaCl 0.44% solution with BAC 0.02%; (C) riboflavin 0.1% in NaCl 0.44% solution with BAC 0.01%; (D) riboflavin 0.1% in NaCl 0.44% solution without BAC; (E) riboflavin 0.1% in NaCl 0.9% solution with BAC 0.02%; and (F) riboflavin 0.1% in NaCl 0.9% solution without BAC. Six eyes in each group were treated. The absorption coefficients of the corneas were measured to characterize the riboflavin penetration into the cornea. RESULTS: There is a large difference in the transepithelial riboflavin penetration of riboflavin 0.1% + BAC 0.02% solutions that contain different NaCl concentrations (NaCl 0.9% versus NaCl 0.44%). The absorption coefficients differed by more than a factor of two (P = 0.004). No statistically significant difference was found between riboflavin 0.1% in NaCl 0.44% solution containing BAC 0.02% and BAC 0.01%. Compared to the standard protocol, these solutions resulted in an absorption coefficient of 37% (BAC 0.02%) and 33% (BAC 0.01%) of the standard epithelium-off procedure. CONCLUSION: The transepithelial riboflavin solution should contain no dextran, but it should include 0.01% BAC and 0.44% NaCl to promote the permeability of riboflavin through the epithelium, resulting in a sufficient concentration of riboflavin in the corneal stroma.
Authors: Ricardo Lamy; Elliot Chan; Hui Zhang; Vasant A Salgaonkar; Sam D Good; Travis C Porco; Chris J Diederich; Jay M Stewart Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-08-28 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Settimio Rossi; Carmine Santamaria; Rosa Boccia; Luigi De Rosa; Francesco Maria D'Alterio; Francesca Simonelli; Giuseppe De Rosa Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 2.031
Authors: Andre A M Torricelli; Matthew R Ford; Vivek Singh; Marcony R Santhiago; William J Dupps; Steven E Wilson Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 3.467