Literature DB >> 22335562

Genetic spatial autocorrelation can readily detect sex-biased dispersal.

Sam C Banks1, Rod Peakall.   

Abstract

Sex-biased dispersal is expected to generate differences in the fine-scale genetic structure of males and females. Therefore, spatial analyses of multilocus genotypes may offer a powerful approach for detecting sex-biased dispersal in natural populations. However, the effects of sex-biased dispersal on fine-scale genetic structure have not been explored. We used simulations and multilocus spatial autocorrelation analysis to investigate how sex-biased dispersal influences fine-scale genetic structure. We evaluated three statistical tests for detecting sex-biased dispersal: bootstrap confidence intervals about autocorrelation r values and recently developed heterogeneity tests at the distance class and whole correlogram levels. Even modest sex bias in dispersal resulted in significantly different fine-scale spatial autocorrelation patterns between the sexes. This was particularly evident when dispersal was strongly restricted in the less-dispersing sex (mean distance <200 m), when differences between the sexes were readily detected over short distances. All tests had high power to detect sex-biased dispersal with large sample sizes (n ≥ 250). However, there was variation in type I error rates among the tests, for which we offer specific recommendations. We found congruence between simulation predictions and empirical data from the agile antechinus, a species that exhibits male-biased dispersal, confirming the power of individual-based genetic analysis to provide insights into asymmetries in male and female dispersal. Our key recommendations for using multilocus spatial autocorrelation analyses to test for sex-biased dispersal are: (i) maximize sample size, not locus number; (ii) concentrate sampling within the scale of positive structure; (iii) evaluate several distance class sizes; (iv) use appropriate methods when combining data from multiple populations; (v) compare the appropriate groups of individuals.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22335562     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05485.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  37 in total

1.  Fine-scale spatial genetic dynamics over the life cycle of the tropical tree Prunus africana.

Authors:  D G Berens; C Braun; S C González-Martínez; E M Griebeler; R Nathan; K Böhning-Gaese
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Spatial genetic structure in American black bears (Ursus americanus): female philopatry is variable and related to population history.

Authors:  Thea V Kristensen; Emily E Puckett; Erin L Landguth; Jerrold L Belant; John T Hast; Colin Carpenter; Jaime L Sajecki; Jeff Beringer; Myron Means; John J Cox; Lori S Eggert; Don White; Kimberly G Smith
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Morphological and genetic diversity of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) in Uganda.

Authors:  David Gopaulchan; Lambert A Motilal; Frances L Bekele; Séverine Clause; James O Ariko; Harriet P Ejang; Pathmanathan Umaharan
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2019-01-01

4.  GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research--an update.

Authors:  Rod Peakall; Peter E Smouse
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Breed locally, disperse globally: fine-scale genetic structure despite landscape-scale panmixia in a fire-specialist.

Authors:  Jennifer C Pierson; Fred W Allendorf; Pierre Drapeau; Michael K Schwartz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sex-biased dispersal at different geographical scales in a cooperative breeder from fragmented rainforest.

Authors:  Carl Vangestel; Tom Callens; Viki Vandomme; Luc Lens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Population Genetic Structure Within and among Seasonal Site Types in the Little Brown Bat (Myotis lucifugus) and the Northern Long-Eared Bat (M. septentrionalis).

Authors:  Laura N L Johnson; Brenna A McLeod; Lynne E Burns; Krista Arseneault; Timothy R Frasier; Hugh G Broders
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Philopatry and dispersal patterns in tiger (Panthera tigris).

Authors:  Digpal Singh Gour; Jyotsna Bhagavatula; Maradani Bhavanishankar; Patlolla Anuradha Reddy; Jaya A Gupta; Mriganka Shekhar Sarkar; Shaik Mohammed Hussain; Segu Harika; Ravinder Gulia; Sisinthy Shivaji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Flying between sky islands: the effect of naturally fragmented habitat on butterfly population structure.

Authors:  Sandhya Sekar; Praveen Karanth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The trajectory of dispersal research in conservation biology. Systematic review.

Authors:  Don A Driscoll; Sam C Banks; Philip S Barton; Karen Ikin; Pia Lentini; David B Lindenmayer; Annabel L Smith; Laurence E Berry; Emma L Burns; Amanda Edworthy; Maldwyn J Evans; Rebecca Gibson; Rob Heinsohn; Brett Howland; Geoff Kay; Nicola Munro; Ben C Scheele; Ingrid Stirnemann; Dejan Stojanovic; Nici Sweaney; Nélida R Villaseñor; Martin J Westgate
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.