Literature DB >> 22334593

Ligand-specific roles for transmembrane 5 serine residues in the binding and efficacy of dopamine D(1) receptor catechol agonists.

Benjamin R Chemel1, Lisa A Bonner, Val J Watts, David E Nichols.   

Abstract

To refine further the structure-activity relationships of D(1) dopamine receptor agonists, we investigated the roles of three conserved serine residues [Ser198(5.42), Ser199(5.43), and Ser202(5.46)] in agonist binding and receptor activation. These transmembrane domain 5 (TM5) residues are believed to engage catechol ligands through polar interactions. We stably expressed wild-type or mutant (S198A, S199A, and S202A) D(1) receptors in human embryonic kidney cells. These receptors were expressed at similar levels (approximately 2000 fmol/mg) and bound the radioligand [(3)H]R(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SCH 23390), although S198A and S199A displayed significant losses of affinity compared with that for wild-type receptors. The endogenous agonist, dopamine, had losses of potency at each of the mutant receptors. We tested cyclohexyl-substituted isochroman, carbocyclic, and chroman bicyclic dopamine analogs and found that the mutations affected the chroman to a lesser extent than the other compounds. These results support our hypothesis that the decreased D(1) activity of chroman analogs results from a ligand intramolecular hydrogen bond that impairs the ability of the catechol to engage the receptor. Sensitivities of these rigid catechol agonists to the effects of the serine mutations were dependent on ligand geometry, particularly with respect to the rotameric conformation of the ethylamine side chain and the distance between the amino group and each catechol hydroxyl. Functional experiments in striatal tissue suggest that the ability to engage TM5 serines is largely correlated with agonist efficacy for cAMP stimulation. These results provide a new understanding of the complexities of D(1) ligand recognition and agonist activation and have implications for the design of rigid catechol ligands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22334593      PMCID: PMC3336807          DOI: 10.1124/mol.111.077339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.436


  36 in total

1.  Dopamine receptor agonists: selectivity and dopamine D1 receptor efficacy.

Authors:  P H Andersen; J A Jansen
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1990-06-12       Impact factor: 4.432

Review 2.  D1 dopamine receptor--the search for a function: a critical evaluation of the D1/D2 dopamine receptor classification and its functional implications.

Authors:  D Clark; F J White
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  Site-directed mutagenesis of alpha 2A-adrenergic receptors: identification of amino acids involved in ligand binding and receptor activation by agonists.

Authors:  C D Wang; M A Buck; C M Fraser
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.436

4.  Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction.

Authors:  Y Cheng; W H Prusoff
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1973-12-01       Impact factor: 5.858

5.  Identification of two serine residues involved in agonist activation of the beta-adrenergic receptor.

Authors:  C D Strader; M R Candelore; W S Hill; I S Sigal; R A Dixon
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1989-08-15       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Serine mutations in transmembrane V of the dopamine D1 receptor affect ligand interactions and receptor activation.

Authors:  N J Pollock; A M Manelli; C W Hutchins; M E Steffey; R G MacKenzie; D E Frail
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1992-09-05       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Synthesis and dopaminergic activity of 3-substituted 1-(aminomethyl)-3,4-dihydro-5,6-dihydroxy-1H-2-benzopyrans: characterization of an auxiliary binding region in the D1 receptor.

Authors:  M P DeNinno; R Schoenleber; R J Perner; L Lijewski; K E Asin; D R Britton; R MacKenzie; J W Kebabian
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Comparison of 125I-SCH 23982 and [3H]SCH 23390 as ligands for the D-1 dopamine receptor.

Authors:  C P Manik; P B Molinoff; P McGonigle
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.372

9.  Structure-activity relationships in engineered proteins: analysis of use of binding energy by linear free energy relationships.

Authors:  A R Fersht; R J Leatherbarrow; T N Wells
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1987-09-22       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Conserved aspartic acid residues 79 and 113 of the beta-adrenergic receptor have different roles in receptor function.

Authors:  C D Strader; I S Sigal; M R Candelore; E Rands; W S Hill; R A Dixon
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1988-07-25       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  10 in total

1.  Structural signatures of DRD4 mutants revealed using molecular dynamics simulations: Implications for drug targeting.

Authors:  Nidhi Jatana; Lipi Thukral; N Latha
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Functional roles of T3.37 and S5.46 in the activation mechanism of the dopamine D1 receptor.

Authors:  Estefanía A Hugo; Bruce K Cassels; Angélica Fierro
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  SKF-83959 is not a highly-biased functionally selective D1 dopamine receptor ligand with activity at phospholipase C.

Authors:  Sang-Min Lee; Andrew Kant; Daniel Blake; Vishakantha Murthy; Kevin Boyd; Steven J Wyrick; Richard B Mailman
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 5.250

4.  Molecular Determinants of the Intrinsic Efficacy of the Antipsychotic Aripiprazole.

Authors:  Carmen Klein Herenbrink; Ravi Verma; Herman D Lim; Anitha Kopinathan; Alastair Keen; Jeremy Shonberg; Christopher J Draper-Joyce; Peter J Scammells; Arthur Christopoulos; Jonathan A Javitch; Ben Capuano; Lei Shi; J Robert Lane
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 5.100

5.  Computational analysis of C-reactive protein for assessment of molecular dynamics and interaction properties.

Authors:  Chiranjib Chakraborty; Alok Agrawal
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.194

6.  Detailed analysis of biased histamine H₄ receptor signalling by JNJ 7777120 analogues.

Authors:  S Nijmeijer; H F Vischer; F Sirci; S Schultes; H Engelhardt; C de Graaf; E M Rosethorne; S J Charlton; R Leurs
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 7.  Dopamine D1 receptor signaling: does GαQ-phospholipase C actually play a role?

Authors:  Sang-Min Lee; Yang Yang; Richard B Mailman
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 4.030

8.  Long-term, single-center surveillance of non-invasive group A streptococcal (GAS) infections, emm types and emm clusters.

Authors:  Peter Konrad; Markus Hufnagel; Reinhard Berner; Nicole Toepfner
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Ligand-directed bias of G protein signaling at the dopamine D2 receptor.

Authors:  Ee Von Moo; Kasper Harpsøe; Alexander S Hauser; Ikuo Masuho; Hans Bräuner-Osborne; David E Gloriam; Kirill A Martemyanov
Journal:  Cell Chem Biol       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 8.116

10.  Impaired β-arrestin recruitment and reduced desensitization by non-catechol agonists of the D1 dopamine receptor.

Authors:  David L Gray; John A Allen; Scot Mente; Rebecca E O'Connor; George J DeMarco; Ivan Efremov; Patrick Tierney; Dmitri Volfson; Jennifer Davoren; Edward Guilmette; Michelle Salafia; Rouba Kozak; Michael D Ehlers
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 14.919

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.