Brenda L Seago1, Jessica M Ketchum, Rita M Willett. 1. Center for Human Simulation and Patient Safety, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA. blseago@vcu.edu
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Introducing the pelvic examination to novice learners has been a challenging task for medical educators. The purpose of this study was to evaluate an educational intervention adding the use of a pelvic examination simulator (SIM) to the use of genital teaching associates (GTAs) in a pelvic examination skills curriculum for second-year medical students. METHODS: Each student participated in a session with the pelvic simulator and with the GTA. Students were randomized to the training sequence. Outcome measures include the Fear of Pelvic Examination Scale (F-PEXS), blood pressure measurement, and instructor evaluation of learning performance. RESULTS: For students who learned with a GTA in the first session, the mean F-PEXS score decreased significantly, and the learning performance score was significantly higher from sessions 1 to 2. There was no significant change in either measure when the pelvic simulator was used first. For both learning sequences, men had a significantly higher F-PEXS score. CONCLUSIONS: When using simulation to teach the pelvic examination to novices, standardized patients seem to be the better initial training experience, reducing student anxiety and improving learner engagement with subsequent mechanical simulation practice of psychomotor skills.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Introducing the pelvic examination to novice learners has been a challenging task for medical educators. The purpose of this study was to evaluate an educational intervention adding the use of a pelvic examination simulator (SIM) to the use of genital teaching associates (GTAs) in a pelvic examination skills curriculum for second-year medical students. METHODS: Each student participated in a session with the pelvic simulator and with the GTA. Students were randomized to the training sequence. Outcome measures include the Fear of Pelvic Examination Scale (F-PEXS), blood pressure measurement, and instructor evaluation of learning performance. RESULTS: For students who learned with a GTA in the first session, the mean F-PEXS score decreased significantly, and the learning performance score was significantly higher from sessions 1 to 2. There was no significant change in either measure when the pelvic simulator was used first. For both learning sequences, men had a significantly higher F-PEXS score. CONCLUSIONS: When using simulation to teach the pelvic examination to novices, standardized patients seem to be the better initial training experience, reducing student anxiety and improving learner engagement with subsequent mechanical simulation practice of psychomotor skills.
Authors: Christoph Nikendei; Katja Diefenbacher; Nadja Köhl-Hackert; Heike Lauber; Julia Huber; Anne Herrmann-Werner; Wolfgang Herzog; Jobst-Hendrik Schultz; Jana Jünger; Markus Krautter Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2015-02-01 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Danielle J O'Laughlin; Brittany Strelow; Nicole Fellows; Elizabeth Kelsey; Sonya Peters; Joy Stevens; Johanna Tweedy Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2021 Jan-Dec
Authors: Amr Hamza; C Warczok; G Meyberg-Solomayer; Z Takacs; I Juhasz-Boess; E-F Solomayer; M P Radosa; C G Radosa; L Stotz; S Findeklee; J C Radosa Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 2.344