Literature DB >> 22333882

Pelvic examination skills training with genital teaching associates and a pelvic simulator: does sequence matter?

Brenda L Seago1, Jessica M Ketchum, Rita M Willett.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Introducing the pelvic examination to novice learners has been a challenging task for medical educators. The purpose of this study was to evaluate an educational intervention adding the use of a pelvic examination simulator (SIM) to the use of genital teaching associates (GTAs) in a pelvic examination skills curriculum for second-year medical students.
METHODS: Each student participated in a session with the pelvic simulator and with the GTA. Students were randomized to the training sequence. Outcome measures include the Fear of Pelvic Examination Scale (F-PEXS), blood pressure measurement, and instructor evaluation of learning performance.
RESULTS: For students who learned with a GTA in the first session, the mean F-PEXS score decreased significantly, and the learning performance score was significantly higher from sessions 1 to 2. There was no significant change in either measure when the pelvic simulator was used first. For both learning sequences, men had a significantly higher F-PEXS score.
CONCLUSIONS: When using simulation to teach the pelvic examination to novices, standardized patients seem to be the better initial training experience, reducing student anxiety and improving learner engagement with subsequent mechanical simulation practice of psychomotor skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22333882     DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31823b9e46

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Simul Healthc        ISSN: 1559-2332            Impact factor:   1.929


  7 in total

1.  Digital rectal examination skills: first training experiences, the motives and attitudes of standardized patients.

Authors:  Christoph Nikendei; Katja Diefenbacher; Nadja Köhl-Hackert; Heike Lauber; Julia Huber; Anne Herrmann-Werner; Wolfgang Herzog; Jobst-Hendrik Schultz; Jana Jünger; Markus Krautter
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  Genital examination training: assessing the effectiveness of an integrated female and male teaching programme.

Authors:  Lynn McBain; Susan Pullon; Sue Garrett; Kath Hoare
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Hybrid simulation of pediatric gynecologic examination: a mix-methods study of learners' attitudes and factors affecting learning.

Authors:  Anna Torres; Magdalena Horodeńska; Grzegorz Witkowski; Kamil Torres
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 4.  Addressing Anxiety and Fear during the Female Pelvic Examination.

Authors:  Danielle J O'Laughlin; Brittany Strelow; Nicole Fellows; Elizabeth Kelsey; Sonya Peters; Joy Stevens; Johanna Tweedy
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

5.  The association of standardized patient educators (ASPE) gynecological teaching associate (GTA) and male urogenital teaching associate (MUTA) standards of best practice.

Authors:  Holly Hopkins; Chelsea Weaks; Tim Webster; Melih Elcin
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-21

6.  Medical students' experiences learning intimate physical examination skills: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Andra M Dabson; Parker J Magin; Gaynor Heading; Dimity Pond
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Teaching undergraduate students gynecological and obstetrical examination skills: the patient's opinion.

Authors:  Amr Hamza; C Warczok; G Meyberg-Solomayer; Z Takacs; I Juhasz-Boess; E-F Solomayer; M P Radosa; C G Radosa; L Stotz; S Findeklee; J C Radosa
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.344

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.