Literature DB >> 22333534

A smart micro-drill for cochleostomy formation: a comparison of cochlear disturbances with manual drilling and a human trial.

C J Coulson1, M Zoka Assadi, R P Taylor, X Du, P N Brett, A P Reid, D W Proops.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cochleostomy formation is a key stage of the cochlear implantation procedure. Minimizing the trauma sustained by the cochlea during this step is thought to be a critical feature in hearing preservation cochlear implantation. The aim of this paper is firstly, to assess the cochlea disturbances during manual and robotic cochleostomy formation. Secondly, to determine whether the use of a smart micro-drill is feasible during human cochlear implantation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The disturbances within the cochlea during cochleostomy formation were analysed in a porcine specimen by creating a third window cochleostomy, preserving the underlying endosteal membrane, on the anterior aspect of the basal turn of the cochlea. A laser vibrometer was aimed at this third window, to assess its movement while a traditional cochleostomy was performed. Six cochleostomies were performed in total, three manually and three with a smart micro-drill. The mean and peak membrane movement was calculated for both manual and smart micro-drill arms, to represent the disturbances sustained within cochlea during cochleostomy formation. The smart micro-drill was further used to perform live human robotic cochleostomies on three adult patients who met the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence criteria for undergoing cochlear implantation.
RESULTS: In the porcine trial, the smart micro-drill preserved the endosteal membrane in all three cases. The velocity of movement of the endosteal membrane during manual cochleostomy is approximately 20 times higher on average and 100 times greater in peak velocity, than for robotic cochleostomy. The robot was safely utilized in theatre in all three cases and successfully created a bony cochleostomy while preserving the underlying endosteal membrane.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experiments have revealed that controlling the force of drilling during cochleostomy formation and opening the endosteal membrane with a pick will minimize the trauma sustained by the cochlea by a factor of 20. Additionally, the smart micro-drill can safely perform a bony cochleostomy in humans under operative conditions and preserve the integrity of the underlying endosteal membrane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22333534     DOI: 10.1179/1754762811Y.0000000018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int        ISSN: 1467-0100


  7 in total

Review 1.  Outlook and future of inner ear therapy.

Authors:  Jenna Devare; Samuel Gubbels; Yehoash Raphael
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Feasibility study of a hand guided robotic drill for cochleostomy.

Authors:  Peter Brett; Xinli Du; Masoud Zoka-Assadi; Chris Coulson; Andrew Reid; David Proops
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  A cadaver study of mastoidectomy using an image-guided human-robot collaborative control system.

Authors:  Myung Hoon Yoo; Hwan Seo Lee; Chan Joo Yang; Seung Hwan Lee; Hoon Lim; Seongpung Lee; Byung-Ju Yi; Jong Woo Chung
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-09-25

4.  A hand-guided robotic drill for cochleostomy on human cadavers.

Authors:  Xinli Du; Peter N Brett; Yu Zhang; Philip Begg; Alistair Mitchell-Innes; Chris Coulson; Richard Irving
Journal:  Robot Surg       Date:  2018-03-20

5.  Image-Based Planning of Minimally Traumatic Inner Ear Access for Robotic Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Fabian Mueller; Jan Hermann; Stefan Weber; Gabriela O'Toole Bom Braga; Vedat Topsakal
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-11-25

6.  First Study in Men Evaluating a Surgical Robotic Tool Providing Autonomous Inner Ear Access for Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Vedat Topsakal; Emilie Heuninck; Marco Matulic; Ahmet M Tekin; Griet Mertens; Vincent Van Rompaey; Pablo Galeazzi; Masoud Zoka-Assadi; Paul van de Heyning
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Direct Acoustic Stimulation at the Lateral Canal: An Alternative Route to the Inner Ear?

Authors:  Nicolas Verhaert; Joris Walraevens; Christian Desloovere; Jan Wouters; Jean-Marc Gérard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.