Literature DB >> 22333462

Prediction of intracerebral hemorrhage following thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke using multiple artificial neural networks.

Permphan Dharmasaroja1, Pornpatr A Dharmasaroja.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been increasingly used in diagnosis and the prediction of outcome, mortality, and risk factors in ischemic stroke. Each model may have different accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in processing the same clinical information. Thus, using only one model of ANNs may mislead the prediction. The present study aimed to predict symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) following thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke based on clinical, laboratory, and imaging data using multiple ANN models.
METHODS: Models for radial basis function (RBF), multilayer perceptron (MLP), probabilistic neural network (PNN), and support vector machine (SVM) were generated to analyze 194 datasets with 29 predictive variables. The relative importance of each predictor variable was calculated using sensitivity analysis.
RESULTS: Comparison among the models based on the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) showed no significantly statistical difference in predictive performance among RBF, MLP, and PNN. PNN showed significantly better performance than SVM. With a minimum importance score of 50 together with an AUC value ≥0·50, three models identified stroke subtype as an important predictive variable for SICH. Other potential predictors were stroke location, prothrombin time, low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, diastolic blood pressure, International Normalized Ratio, and brain computed tomography findings. DISCUSSION: Although ANN models showed similar performance, the classification results were not totally alike, suggesting an advantage of using multiple classification models over a single model. The predictive results are supported by previous statistical studies on different datasets, suggesting generalizability of the utility of ANN analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22333462     DOI: 10.1179/1743132811Y.0000000067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Res        ISSN: 0161-6412            Impact factor:   2.448


  6 in total

1.  A Support Vector Machine based method to distinguish proteobacterial proteins from eukaryotic plant proteins.

Authors:  Ruchi Verma; Ulrich Melcher
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Personalized risk prediction of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after stroke thrombolysis using a machine-learning model.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Yuanhanqing Huang; Yong Xia; Wei Zhang; Kun Fang; Xiaoyu Zhou; Xiaofei Yu; Xin Cheng; Gang Li; Xiaoping Wang; Guojun Luo; Danhong Wu; Xueyuan Liu; Bruce C V Campbell; Qiang Dong; Yuwu Zhao
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 6.570

3.  Machine learning prediction of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after stroke thrombolysis: a cross-cultural validation in Caucasian and Han Chinese cohort.

Authors:  Junfeng Liu; Xinyue Chen; Xiaonan Guo; Renjie Xu; Yanan Wang; Ming Liu
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 6.430

4.  Prediction of stroke thrombolysis outcome using CT brain machine learning.

Authors:  Paul Bentley; Jeban Ganesalingam; Anoma Lalani Carlton Jones; Kate Mahady; Sarah Epton; Paul Rinne; Pankaj Sharma; Omid Halse; Amrish Mehta; Daniel Rueckert
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 4.881

5.  Meteorological Factors Related to Emergency Admission of Elderly Stroke Patients in Shanghai: Analysis with a Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network.

Authors:  Guilin Meng; Yan Tan; Min Fang; Hongyan Yang; Xueyuan Liu; Yanxin Zhao
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-11-21

6.  The combination of three molecular markers can be a valuable predictive tool for the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Sheng-Sen Chen; Kang-Kang Yu; Qing-Xia Ling; Chong Huang; Ning Li; Jian-Ming Zheng; Su-Xia Bao; Qi Cheng; Meng-Qi Zhu; Ming-Quan Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.