Literature DB >> 22333135

An online brain-computer interface based on shifting attention to concurrent streams of auditory stimuli.

N J Hill1, B Schölkopf.   

Abstract

We report on the development and online testing of an electroencephalogram-based brain-computer interface (BCI) that aims to be usable by completely paralysed users-for whom visual or motor-system-based BCIs may not be suitable, and among whom reports of successful BCI use have so far been very rare. The current approach exploits covert shifts of attention to auditory stimuli in a dichotic-listening stimulus design. To compare the efficacy of event-related potentials (ERPs) and steady-state auditory evoked potentials (SSAEPs), the stimuli were designed such that they elicited both ERPs and SSAEPs simultaneously. Trial-by-trial feedback was provided online, based on subjects' modulation of N1 and P3 ERP components measured during single 5 s stimulation intervals. All 13 healthy subjects were able to use the BCI, with performance in a binary left/right choice task ranging from 75% to 96% correct across subjects (mean 85%). BCI classification was based on the contrast between stimuli in the attended stream and stimuli in the unattended stream, making use of every stimulus, rather than contrasting frequent standard and rare 'oddball' stimuli. SSAEPs were assessed offline: for all subjects, spectral components at the two exactly known modulation frequencies allowed discrimination of pre-stimulus from stimulus intervals, and of left-only stimuli from right-only stimuli when one side of the dichotic stimulus pair was muted. However, attention modulation of SSAEPs was not sufficient for single-trial BCI communication, even when the subject's attention was clearly focused well enough to allow classification of the same trials via ERPs. ERPs clearly provided a superior basis for BCI. The ERP results are a promising step towards the development of a simple-to-use, reliable yes/no communication system for users in the most severely paralysed states, as well as potential attention-monitoring and -training applications outside the context of assistive technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22333135      PMCID: PMC3366495          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/9/2/026011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  33 in total

1.  Visual spatial attention control in an independent brain-computer interface.

Authors:  Simon P Kelly; Edmund C Lalor; Ciarán Finucane; Gary McDarby; Richard B Reilly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  The effect of attention on the auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  B Ross; T W Picton; A T Herdman; C Pantev
Journal:  Neurol Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-11-30

3.  Towards an independent brain-computer interface using steady state visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Brendan Z Allison; Dennis J McFarland; Gerwin Schalk; Shi Dong Zheng; Melody Moore Jackson; Jonathan R Wolpaw
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  An independent brain-computer interface using covert non-spatial visual selective attention.

Authors:  Dan Zhang; Alexander Maye; Xiaorong Gao; Bo Hong; Andreas K Engel; Shangkai Gao
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  P300 audio-visual speller.

Authors:  A Belitski; J Farquhar; P Desain
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  L A Farwell; E Donchin
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-12

7.  Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; R F Hink; V L Schwent; T W Picton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Neurofeedback treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children: a comparison with methylphenidate.

Authors:  Thomas Fuchs; Niels Birbaumer; Werner Lutzenberger; John H Gruzelier; Jochen Kaiser
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2003-03

9.  A new auditory multi-class brain-computer interface paradigm: spatial hearing as an informative cue.

Authors:  Martijn Schreuder; Benjamin Blankertz; Michael Tangermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Toward a high-throughput auditory P300-based brain-computer interface.

Authors:  D S Klobassa; T M Vaughan; P Brunner; N E Schwartz; J R Wolpaw; C Neuper; E W Sellers
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  26 in total

1.  Brain-computer interface: current and emerging rehabilitation applications.

Authors:  Janis J Daly; Jane E Huggins
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Neural mechanisms of training an auditory event-related potential task in a brain-computer interface context.

Authors:  Sebastian Halder; Teresa Leinfelder; Stefan M Schulz; Andrea Kübler
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Usage of drip drops as stimuli in an auditory P300 BCI paradigm.

Authors:  Minqiang Huang; Jing Jin; Yu Zhang; Dewen Hu; Xingyu Wang
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Selective attention in an overcrowded auditory scene: implications for auditory-based brain-computer interface design.

Authors:  Ross K Maddox; Willy Cheung; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A practical, intuitive brain-computer interface for communicating 'yes' or 'no' by listening.

Authors:  N Jeremy Hill; Erin Ricci; Sameah Haider; Lynn M McCane; Susan Heckman; Jonathan R Wolpaw; Theresa M Vaughan
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Workshops of the Fifth International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting: Defining the Future.

Authors:  Jane E Huggins; Christoph Guger; Brendan Allison; Charles W Anderson; Aaron Batista; Anne-Marie A-M Brouwer; Clemens Brunner; Ricardo Chavarriaga; Melanie Fried-Oken; Aysegul Gunduz; Disha Gupta; Andrea Kübler; Robert Leeb; Fabien Lotte; Lee E Miller; Gernot Müller-Putz; Tomasz Rutkowski; Michael Tangermann; David Edward Thompson
Journal:  Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon)       Date:  2014-01

7.  Identifying the Attended Speaker Using Electrocorticographic (ECoG) Signals.

Authors:  K Dijkstra; P Brunner; A Gunduz; W Coon; A L Ritaccio; J Farquhar; G Schalk
Journal:  Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon)       Date:  2015-08-26

8.  Individual differences in attentional modulation of cortical responses correlate with selective attention performance.

Authors:  Inyong Choi; Le Wang; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Behind the Scenes of Noninvasive Brain-Computer Interfaces: A Review of Electroencephalography Signals, How They Are Recorded, and Why They Matter.

Authors:  Kevin M Pitt; Jonathan S Brumberg; Jeremy D Burnison; Jyutika Mehta; Juhi Kidwai
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2019-11-09

10.  Categorical vowel perception enhances the effectiveness and generalization of auditory feedback in human-machine-interfaces.

Authors:  Eric Larson; Howard P Terry; Margaux M Canevari; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.