Literature DB >> 22332799

Learning to fear suffocation: a new paradigm for interoceptive fear conditioning.

Meike Pappens1, Elyn Smets, Debora Vansteenwegen, Omer Van Den Bergh, Ilse Van Diest.   

Abstract

The present study aimed to establish a new interoceptive fear conditioning paradigm. The conditioned stimulus (CS) was a flow resistor that slightly obstructs breathing; the unconditional stimulus (US) was a breathing occlusion. The paired group (N = 21) received 6 acquisition trials with paired CS-US presentations. The unpaired group (N = 19) received 6 trials of unpaired CS-US presentations. In the extinction phase, both groups were administered 6 CS-only trials. Measurements included startle eyeblink response, electrodermal responses, and self-reported US expectancy. In the paired group, startle blink responses were larger during CS compared to intertrial interval during acquisition and extinction. Electrodermal and US expectancies were larger for the paired than for the unpaired group during acquisition, but not during extinction. The present paradigm successfully established interoceptive fear conditioning with panic-relevant stimuli.
Copyright © 2012 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22332799     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01357.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  8 in total

1.  Subjective ratings of prolonged inspiratory resistive loaded breathing in males and females.

Authors:  Sarah Miller; Paul W Davenport
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Breath holding duration as a measure of distress tolerance: examining its relation to measures of executive control.

Authors:  Stefan Sütterlin; Mathias Schroijen; Elena Constantinou; Elyn Smets; Omer Van den Bergh; Ilse Van Diest
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-29

3.  Resting heart rate variability predicts safety learning and fear extinction in an interoceptive fear conditioning paradigm.

Authors:  Meike Pappens; Mathias Schroijen; Stefan Sütterlin; Elyn Smets; Omer Van den Bergh; Julian F Thayer; Ilse Van Diest
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Brain Responses during the Anticipation of Dyspnea.

Authors:  M Cornelia Stoeckel; Roland W Esser; Matthias Gamer; Christian Büchel; Andreas von Leupoldt
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 3.599

5.  Interoceptive fear learning to mild breathlessness as a laboratory model for unexpected panic attacks.

Authors:  Meike Pappens; Evelien Vandenbossche; Omer Van den Bergh; Ilse Van Diest
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-06

6.  The weight of cognitions in panic: the link between misinterpretations and panic attacks.

Authors:  Klara De Cort; Dirk Hermans; Daphne Noortman; Wiesje Arends; Eric J L Griez; Koen R J Schruers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Contingency Awareness Shapes Acquisition and Extinction of Emotional Responses in a Conditioning Model of Pain-Related Fear.

Authors:  Franziska Labrenz; Adriane Icenhour; Sven Benson; Sigrid Elsenbruch
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Interferences between breathing, experimental dyspnoea and bodily self-consciousness.

Authors:  Etienne Allard; Elisa Canzoneri; Dan Adler; Capucine Morélot-Panzini; Javier Bello-Ruiz; Bruno Herbelin; Olaf Blanke; Thomas Similowski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.