Literature DB >> 22332730

Effects of an educational patient safety campaign on patients' safety behaviours and adverse events.

David L B Schwappach1, Olga Frank, Ute Buschmann, Reto Babst.   

Abstract

Rationale, aims and objectives  The study aims to investigate the effects of a patient safety advisory on patients' risk perceptions, perceived behavioural control, performance of safety behaviours and experience of adverse incidents. Method  Quasi-experimental intervention study with non-equivalent group comparison was used. Patients admitted to the surgical department of a Swiss large non-university hospital were included. Patients in the intervention group received a safety advisory at their first clinical encounter. Outcomes were assessed using a questionnaire at discharge. Odds ratios for control versus intervention group were calculated. Regression analysis was used to model the effects of the intervention and safety behaviours on the experience of safety incidents. Results  Two hundred eighteen patients in the control and 202 in the intervention group completed the survey (75 and 77% response rates, respectively). Patients in the intervention group were less likely to feel poorly informed about medical errors (OR = 0.55, P = 0.043). There were 73.1% in the intervention and 84.3% in the control group who underestimated the risk for infection (OR = 0.51, CI 0.31-0.84, P = 0.009). Perceived behavioural control was lower in the control group (meanCon  = 3.2, meanInt  = 3.5, P = 0.010). Performance of safety-related behaviours was unaffected by the intervention. Patients in the intervention group were less likely to experience any safety-related incident or unsafe situation (OR for intervention group = 0.57, CI 0.38-0.87, P = 0.009). There were no differences in concerns for errors during hospitalization. There were 96% of patients (intervention) who would recommend other patients to read the advisory. Conclusions  The results suggest that the safety advisory decreases experiences of adverse events and unsafe situations. It renders awareness and perceived behavioural control without increasing concerns for safety and can thus serve as a useful instrument for communication about safety between health care workers and patients.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22332730     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01820.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  10 in total

1.  Patients' Perspectives of Engagement as a Safety Strategy.

Authors:  Chasity Burrows Walters; Elizabeth A Duthie
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 2.  Evaluation of Patient and Family Engagement Strategies to Improve Medication Safety.

Authors:  Julia M Kim; Catalina Suarez-Cuervo; Zackary Berger; Joy Lee; Jessica Gayleard; Carol Rosenberg; Natalia Nagy; Kristina Weeks; Sydney Dy
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Analysis of the third WHO Global Safety Challenge 'Medication Without Harm' patient-facing materials: exploratory descriptive study.

Authors:  Kisshante Subakumar; Bryony Dean Franklin; Sara Garfield
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2020-10-29

4.  Active Integration of Patients into Infection Control, as perceived by Health Care Professionals: Results of the AHOI Pilot Study.

Authors:  Stephan Diedrich; Tillmann Görig; Kathleen Dittmann; Axel Kramer; Claus-Dieter Heidecke; Nils-Olaf Hübner
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Using the Health Belief Model to explain patient involvement in patient safety.

Authors:  Andrea C Bishop; G Ross Baker; Todd A Boyle; Neil J MacKinnon
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 6.  Promoting engagement by patients and families to reduce adverse events in acute care settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zackary Berger; Tabor E Flickinger; Elizabeth Pfoh; Kathryn A Martinez; Sydney M Dy
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 7.  Patient autonomy and disclosure of material information about hospital-acquired infections.

Authors:  Sorin Hostiuc; Arthur-Jozsef Molnar; Alin Moldoveanu; Maria Aluaş; Florica Moldoveanu; Iuliana Bocicor; Maria-Iuliana Dascalu; Elisabeta Bădilă; Mihaela Hostiuc; Ionut Negoi
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 8.  Do patient engagement interventions work for all patients? A systematic review and realist synthesis of interventions to enhance patient safety.

Authors:  Bronwyn Newman; Kathryn Joseph; Ashfaq Chauhan; Holly Seale; Jiadai Li; Elizabeth Manias; Merrilyn Walton; Stephen Mears; Benjamin Jones; Reema Harrison
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  The effects of a mobile application for patient participation to improve patient safety.

Authors:  Nam-Ju Lee; Shinae Ahn; Miseon Lee
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.318

10.  A Spanish pillbox app for elderly patients taking multiple medications: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  José Joaquín Mira; Isabel Navarro; Federico Botella; Fernando Borrás; Roberto Nuño-Solinís; Domingo Orozco; Fuencisla Iglesias-Alonso; Pastora Pérez-Pérez; Susana Lorenzo; Nuria Toro
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 5.428

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.