Literature DB >> 22332126

Comparability of Internet and telephone data in a survey on the respiratory health of children.

Céline Plante1, Louis Jacques, Serge Chevalier, Michel Fournier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mixing survey administration modes has generated concern about the comparability of responses between modes.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the differences in respondent profiles, and responses between Internet and telephone questionnaires in a survey on respiratory diseases.
METHODS: The data were generated from a mixed Internet and telephone survey of respiratory diseases among children in Montreal (Quebec), in 2006. Comparison of 12 selected questions was performed after standardization for respondent education and income. Stratification of analysis on education and income categories was also performed for the questions with significantly divergent responses.
RESULTS: Six questions showed significant differences in responses between modes after standardization. The largest differences among the closed-ended questions were observed for highly prevalent symptoms, dry cough during the night (difference of 9% for positive answer [P<0.01]) and symptoms of allergic rhinitis (difference of 7% for positive answer [P<0.01]). A large discrepancy was also found in the multiple choice question and with an open-ended response (ie, free answer). For the three potentially sensitive questions, a desirability bias was probably present in one question on smoking habits (difference of 2.6 % for positive answer [P<0.05]).
CONCLUSION: The differences observed between Internet and telephone responses to selected questions were not completely explained by socioeconomic disparities among the respondents. In a mixed-mode survey (Internet and telephone), caution should be used when formulating sensitive, complex, open-ended and long-ended questions, and those related to highly prevalent and nonspecific symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22332126      PMCID: PMC3299055          DOI: 10.1155/2012/318941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Respir J        ISSN: 1198-2241            Impact factor:   2.409


  7 in total

1.  The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment.

Authors:  R Curtin; S Presser; E Singer
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

2.  Comparison of telephone and postal survey modes on respiratory symptoms and risk factors.

Authors:  Jan Brøgger; Per Bakke; Geir E Eide; Amund Gulsvik
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey.

Authors:  S Keeter; C Miller; A Kohut; R M Groves; S Presser
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

Review 4.  Survey research and societal change.

Authors:  Roger Tourangeau
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Home environmental factors associated with poor asthma control in Montreal children: a population-based study.

Authors:  Leylâ Değer; Céline Plante; Sophie Goudreau; Audrey Smargiassi; Stéphane Perron; Robert L Thivierge; Louis Jacques
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.515

6.  Effects of survey mode on self-reports of adult alcohol consumption: a comparison of mail, web and telephone approaches.

Authors:  Michael W Link; Ali H Mokdad
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2005-03

7.  Telephone and web: mixed-mode challenge.

Authors:  Jessica Greene; Howard Speizer; Wyndy Wiitala
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.402

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Survey mode influence on patient-reported outcome scores in orthopaedic surgery: telephone results may be positively biased.

Authors:  Jon E Hammarstedt; John M Redmond; Asheesh Gupta; Kevin F Dunne; S Pavan Vemula; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Differential item functioning to validate setting of delivery compatibility in PROMIS-global health.

Authors:  Dylan J Parker; Paul M Werth; David D Christensen; David S Jevsevar
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  A Comparison of Web and Telephone Responses From a National HIV and AIDS Survey.

Authors:  Marcella K Jones; Liviana Calzavara; Dan Allman; Catherine A Worthington; Mark Tyndall; James Iveniuk
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2016-07-29

4.  Comparison of response patterns in different survey designs: a longitudinal panel with mixed-mode and online-only design.

Authors:  Nicole Rübsamen; Manas K Akmatov; Stefanie Castell; André Karch; Rafael T Mikolajczyk
Journal:  Emerg Themes Epidemiol       Date:  2017-03-21

Review 5.  Investigating the Bias in Orthopaedic Patient-reported Outcome Measures by Mode of Administration: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan Acosta; Peter Tang; Steven Regal; Sam Akhavan; Alan Reynolds; Rebecca Schorr; Jon E Hammarstedt
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-12-04

6.  Sources of information influencing decision-making in orthopaedic surgery - an international online survey of 1147 orthopaedic surgeons.

Authors:  Arndt P Schulz; Anders Jönsson; Richard Kasch; Prithee Jettoo; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.