Literature DB >> 2233209

The accuracy of self-reports of physical activity.

R C Klesges1, L H Eck, M W Mellon, W Fulliton, G W Somes, C L Hanson.   

Abstract

This investigation determined the accuracy of self-reports of physical activity compared to observations obtained surreptitiously. Subjects were 44 adults engaged in 1 h of their preferred physical activity while actual activity levels were surreptitiously obtained and compared to immediate self-reported estimates of physical activity. Results indicated that subjects were moderately accurate in recalling their physical activity levels (R = 0.62) but underestimated sedentary activities and overestimated aerobic activities by over 300%. Males overestimated their activity relative to females, and obese subjects underestimated their activity levels compared to normal-weight subjects. Finally, a number of two-way interactions that moderated the accuracy of those subjects engaging in high chronic levels of physical activity were observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2233209     DOI: 10.1249/00005768-199010000-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  59 in total

Review 1.  Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires.

Authors:  R J Shephard
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Incidence, severity, aetiology and prevention of sports injuries. A review of concepts.

Authors:  W van Mechelen; H Hlobil; H C Kemper
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Physical fitness, rather than self-reported physical activities, is more strongly associated with low back pain: evidence from a working population.

Authors:  Hans Heneweer; H Susan J Picavet; Filip Staes; Henri Kiers; Luc Vanhees
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Measurement of human energy expenditure, with particular reference to field studies: an historical perspective.

Authors:  Roy J Shephard; Yukitoshi Aoyagi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Mixed methods evaluation of a randomized control pilot trial targeting sugar-sweetened beverage behaviors.

Authors:  Jamie Zoellner; Emily Cook; Yvonnes Chen; Wen You; Brenda Davy; Paul Estabrooks
Journal:  Open J Prev Med       Date:  2013-02-01

6.  Kids SIPsmartER, a cluster randomized controlled trial and multi-level intervention to improve sugar-sweetened beverages behaviors among Appalachian middle-school students: Rationale, design & methods.

Authors:  Jamie M Zoellner; Kathleen J Porter; Wen You; Phillip I Chow; Lee M Ritterband; Maryam Yuhas; Annie Loyd; Brittany A McCormick; Donna-Jean P Brock
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  A rapidly occurring compensatory decrease in physical activity counteracts diet-induced weight loss in female monkeys.

Authors:  Elinor L Sullivan; Judy L Cameron
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 8.  Relationship between the risk of breast cancer and physical activity. An epidemiological perspective.

Authors:  P Latikka; E Pukkala; V Vihko
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 9.  Sports injury surveillance systems. 'One size fits all'?

Authors:  W van Mechelen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Measures of physical activity and their correlates: the Swedish National March Cohort.

Authors:  Ylva Trolle Lagerros; Rino Bellocco; Hans-Olov Adami; Olof Nyrén
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 8.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.