Literature DB >> 22331940

Minimal residual disease quantification is an independent predictor of progression-free and overall survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a multivariate analysis from the randomized GCLLSG CLL8 trial.

Sebastian Böttcher1, Matthias Ritgen, Kirsten Fischer, Stephan Stilgenbauer, Raymonde M Busch, Günter Fingerle-Rowson, Anna Maria Fink, Andreas Bühler, Thorsten Zenz, Michael Karl Wenger, Myriam Mendila, Clemens-Martin Wendtner, Barbara F Eichhorst, Hartmut Döhner, Michael J Hallek, Michael Kneba.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical significance of flow cytometric minimal residual disease (MRD) quantification in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in addition to pretherapeutic risk factors and to compare the prognostic impact of MRD between the arms of the German CLL Study Group CLL8 trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MRD levels were prospectively quantified in 1,775 blood and bone marrow samples from 493 patients randomly assigned to receive fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC) or FC plus rituximab (FCR). Patients were categorized by MRD into low- (< 10(-4)), intermediate- (≥ 10(-4) to <10(-2)), and high-level (≥ 10(-2)) groups.
RESULTS: Low MRD levels during and after therapy were associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS; P < .0001). Median PFS is estimated at 68.7, 40.5, and 15.4 months for low, intermediate, and high MRD levels, respectively, when assessed 2 months after therapy. Compared with patients with low MRD, greater risks of disease progression were associated with intermediate and high MRD levels (hazard ratios, 2.49 and 14.7, respectively; both P < .0001). Median OS was 48.4 months in patients with high MRD and was not reached for lower MRD levels. MRD remained predictive for OS and PFS in multivariate analyses that included the most important pretherapeutic risk markers in CLL. PFS and OS did not differ between treatment arms within each MRD category. However, FCR induced low MRD levels more frequently than FC.
CONCLUSION: MRD levels independently predict OS and PFS in CLL. Therefore, MRD quantification might serve as a surrogate marker to assess treatment efficacy in randomized trials before clinical end points can be evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22331940     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.9348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  127 in total

Review 1.  Can prognostic factors be used to direct therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia?

Authors:  Leopold Sellner; Sascha Dietrich; Peter Dreger; Hanno Glimm; Thorsten Zenz
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.952

2.  Risk categories and refractory CLL in the era of chemoimmunotherapy.

Authors:  Thorsten Zenz; John G Gribben; Michael Hallek; Hartmut Döhner; Michael J Keating; Stephan Stilgenbauer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Eliminating minimal residual disease as a therapeutic end point: working toward cure for patients with CLL.

Authors:  Philip A Thompson; William G Wierda
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Molecular prediction of durable remission after first-line fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Davide Rossi; Lodovico Terzi-di-Bergamo; Lorenzo De Paoli; Michaela Cerri; Guido Ghilardi; Annalisa Chiarenza; Pietro Bulian; Carlo Visco; Francesca R Mauro; Fortunato Morabito; Agostino Cortelezzi; Francesco Zaja; Francesco Forconi; Luca Laurenti; Ilaria Del Giudice; Massimo Gentile; Iolanda Vincelli; Marina Motta; Marta Coscia; Gian Matteo Rigolin; Alessandra Tedeschi; Antonino Neri; Roberto Marasca; Omar Perbellini; Carol Moreno; Giovanni Del Poeta; Massimo Massaia; Pier Luigi Zinzani; Marco Montillo; Antonio Cuneo; Valter Gattei; Robin Foà; Gianluca Gaidano
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  A phase II multi-center trial of pentostatin plus cyclophosphamide with ofatumumab in older previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients.

Authors:  Alessandra Tedeschi; Davide Rossi; Marina Motta; Giulia Quaresmini; Marianna Rossi; Marta Coscia; Antonella Anastasia; Fausto Rossini; Agostino Cortelezzi; Guido Nador; Lydia Scarfò; Roberto Cairoli; Anna Maria Frustaci; Daniela Dalceggio; Paola Picardi; Lorenzo De Paoli; Ester Orlandi; Alessandro Rambaldi; Massimo Massaia; Gianluca Gaidano; Marco Montillo
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab plus granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor as frontline treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Paolo Strati; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Susan Lerner; Susan O'Brien; William Wierda; Michael J Keating; Stefan Faderl
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2013-07-29

Review 7.  How will B-cell-receptor-targeted therapies change future CLL therapy?

Authors:  Jeffrey A Jones; John C Byrd
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Multivalent DNA nanospheres for enhanced capture of cancer cells in microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Weian Sheng; Tao Chen; Weihong Tan; Z Hugh Fan
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 9.  Obinutuzumab for the treatment of patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia: overview and perspective.

Authors:  Carolyn J Owen; Douglas A Stewart
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2015-08

10.  Impact of dose intensity on outcome of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab regimen given in the first-line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Bouvet; Cécile Borel; Lucie Obéric; Gisèle Compaci; Bruno Cazin; Anne-Sophie Michallet; Guy Laurent; Loic Ysebaert
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 9.941

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.