PURPOSE: Based on reports of safety and efficacy, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for treatment of malignant spinal tumors was initiated at our institution. We report prospective results of this population at Mayo Clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April 2008 and December 2010, 85 lesions in 66 patients were treated with SBRT for spinal metastases. Twenty-two lesions (25.8%) were treated for recurrence after prior radiotherapy (RT). The mean age of patients was 56.8 ± 13.4 years. Patients were treated to a median dose of 24 Gy (range, 10-40 Gy) in a median of three fractions (range, 1-5). Radiation was delivered with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and prescribed to cover 80% of the planning target volume (PTV) with organs at risk such as the spinal cord taking priority over PTV coverage. RESULTS: Tumor sites included 48, 22, 12, and 3 in the thoracic, lumbar, cervical, and sacral spine, respectively. The mean actuarial survival at 12 months was 52.2%. A total of 7 patients had both local and marginal failure, 1 patient experienced marginal but not local failure, and 1 patient had local failure only. Actuarial local control at 1 year was 83.3% and 91.2% in patients with and without prior RT. The median dose delivered to patients who experienced local/marginal failure was 24 Gy (range, 18-30 Gy) in a median of three fractions (range, 1-5). No cases of Grade 4 toxicity were reported. In 1 of 2 patients experiencing Grade 3 toxicity, SBRT was given after previous radiation. CONCLUSION: The results indicate SBRT to be an effective measure to achieve local control in spinal metastases. Toxicity of treatment was rare, including those previously irradiated. Our results appear comparable to previous reports analyzing spine SBRT. Further research is needed to determine optimum dose and fractionation to further improve local control and prevent toxicity. Copyright Â
PURPOSE: Based on reports of safety and efficacy, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for treatment of malignant spinal tumors was initiated at our institution. We report prospective results of this population at Mayo Clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April 2008 and December 2010, 85 lesions in 66 patients were treated with SBRT for spinal metastases. Twenty-two lesions (25.8%) were treated for recurrence after prior radiotherapy (RT). The mean age of patients was 56.8 ± 13.4 years. Patients were treated to a median dose of 24 Gy (range, 10-40 Gy) in a median of three fractions (range, 1-5). Radiation was delivered with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and prescribed to cover 80% of the planning target volume (PTV) with organs at risk such as the spinal cord taking priority over PTV coverage. RESULTS: Tumor sites included 48, 22, 12, and 3 in the thoracic, lumbar, cervical, and sacral spine, respectively. The mean actuarial survival at 12 months was 52.2%. A total of 7 patients had both local and marginal failure, 1 patient experienced marginal but not local failure, and 1 patient had local failure only. Actuarial local control at 1 year was 83.3% and 91.2% in patients with and without prior RT. The median dose delivered to patients who experienced local/marginal failure was 24 Gy (range, 18-30 Gy) in a median of three fractions (range, 1-5). No cases of Grade 4 toxicity were reported. In 1 of 2 patients experiencing Grade 3 toxicity, SBRT was given after previous radiation. CONCLUSION: The results indicate SBRT to be an effective measure to achieve local control in spinal metastases. Toxicity of treatment was rare, including those previously irradiated. Our results appear comparable to previous reports analyzing spine SBRT. Further research is needed to determine optimum dose and fractionation to further improve local control and prevent toxicity. Copyright Â
Authors: Kamran A Ahmed; William J Fulp; Anders E Berglund; Sarah E Hoffe; Thomas J Dilling; Steven A Eschrich; Ravi Shridhar; Javier F Torres-Roca Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-03-30 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Matthew M Gestaut; Nitika Thawani; Sangroh Kim; Veera R Gutti; Sameer Jhavar; Niloyjyoti Deb; Andrew Morrow; Russell A Ward; Jason H Huang; Mehul Patel Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Zain A Husain; Arjun Sahgal; Eric L Chang; Pejman Jabehdar Maralani; Charlotte D Kubicky; Kristin J Redmond; Charles Fisher; Ilya Laufer; Simon S Lo Journal: CNS Oncol Date: 2017-07-18
Authors: Morten H Suppli; Per Munck Af Rosenschold; Helle Pappot; Benny Dahl; Søren S Morgen; Ivan R Vogelius; Svend A Engelholm Journal: J Radiosurg SBRT Date: 2016
Authors: Rachit Kumar; Anick Nater; Ahmed Hashmi; Sten Myrehaug; Young Lee; Lijun Ma; Kristin Redmond; Simon S Lo; Eric L Chang; Albert Yee; Charles G Fisher; Michael G Fehlings; Arjun Sahgal Journal: Neurooncol Pract Date: 2015-07-27
Authors: Kristin J Redmond; Scott Robertson; Simon S Lo; Scott G Soltys; Samuel Ryu; Todd McNutt; Samuel T Chao; Yoshiya Yamada; Amol Ghia; Eric L Chang; Jason Sheehan; Arjun Sahgal Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-09-17 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Kristin J Redmond; Simon S Lo; Scott G Soltys; Yoshiya Yamada; Igor J Barani; Paul D Brown; Eric L Chang; Peter C Gerszten; Samuel T Chao; Robert J Amdur; Antonio A F De Salles; Matthias Guckenberger; Bin S Teh; Jason Sheehan; Charles R Kersh; Michael G Fehlings; Moon-Jun Sohn; Ung-Kyu Chang; Samuel Ryu; Iris C Gibbs; Arjun Sahgal Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2016-11-11
Authors: Zain A Husain; Isabelle Thibault; Daniel Letourneau; Lijun Ma; Harald Keller; John Suh; Veronica Chiang; Eric L Chang; Raja K Rampersaud; James Perry; David A Larson; Arjun Sahgal Journal: CNS Oncol Date: 2013-05