Literature DB >> 22330712

A computerized data-capture system for animal biosafety level 4 laboratories.

Dennis A Bente1, Jeremy Friesen, Kyle White, Jordan Koll, Gary P Kobinger.   

Abstract

The restrictive nature of an Animal Biosafety Level 4 (ABSL4) laboratory complicates even simple clinical evaluation including data capture. Typically, clinical data are recorded on paper during procedures, faxed out of the ABSL4, and subsequently manually entered into a computer. This system has many disadvantages including transcriptional errors. Here, we describe the development of a highly customizable, tablet-PC-based computerized data-capture system, allowing reliable collection of observational and clinical data from experimental animals in a restrictive biocontainment setting. A multidisciplinary team with skills in containment laboratory animal science, database design, and software engineering collaborated on the development of this system. The goals were to design an easy-to-use and flexible user interface on a touch-screen tablet PC with user-supportable processes for recovery, full auditing capabilities, and cost effectiveness. The system simplifies data capture, reduces the necessary time in an ABSL4 environment, offers timely reporting and review of data, facilitates statistical analysis, reduces potential of erroneous data entry, improves quality assurance of animal care, and advances the use and refinement of humane endpoints.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22330712      PMCID: PMC3189669     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  5 in total

1.  Handheld digital equipment for weight composite distress paradigms: new considerations and for rapid documentation and intervention of rodent populations.

Authors:  V Hampshire
Journal:  Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2001-07

2.  Implementation of electronic data capture systems: barriers and solutions.

Authors:  James A Welker
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Improving the efficiency and accuracy of a tablet PC interface for computerized provider order entry through usability evaluation and provision of data entry strategies.

Authors:  John Dawson; Andre Kushniruk
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2009

4.  Comparison of paper-based and electronic data collection process in clinical trials: costs simulation study.

Authors:  Ivan Pavlović; Tomaz Kern; Damijan Miklavcic
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 5.  Issues related to the use of animals in biocontainment research facilities.

Authors:  John Copps
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2005
  5 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  The impact of regulations, safety considerations and physical limitations on research progress at maximum biocontainment.

Authors:  Amy C Shurtleff; Nicole Garza; Matthew Lackemeyer; Ricardo Carrion; Anthony Griffiths; Jean Patterson; Samuel S Edwin; Sina Bavari
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.048

2.  Clinical documentation and data transfer from Ebola and Marburg virus disease wards in outbreak settings: health care workers' experiences and preferences.

Authors:  Silja Bühler; Paul Roddy; Ellen Nolte; Matthias Borchert
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.048

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.