Literature DB >> 22330237

Frequency and clinical implications of supraesophageal and dyspeptic symptoms in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Fermín Mearin1, Julio Ponce, Marta Ponce, Agustín Balboa, Miguel A Gónzalez, Javier Zapardiel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We studied the frequency of supraesophageal and dyspeptic symptoms and their impact on the quality of life (QoL) and treatment response in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
METHODS: Multicenter, prospective, observational study of patients who consulted a gastroenterologist because of typical GERD symptoms. Upper digestive symptoms were assessed using direct interviews. The Short Form-12 and the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia questionnaires were used to measure QoL. Patients were treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).
RESULTS: A total of 301 patients (58% men; mean age, 45 years) were included. Baseline symptoms were heartburn (99% of cases; nocturnal heartburn 78%), regurgitation (86%), both heartburn and regurgitation (85%), dyspeptic symptoms (91%; epigastric pain syndrome 20%, postprandial distress syndrome 4%, both 75%), and supraesophageal symptoms (58%). In 56% of cases of heartburn, 35% of regurgitation, and 34% of nocturnal heartburn, symptoms were severe or very severe. One in six patients had dysphagia. Supraesophageal and/or dyspeptic symptoms were associated with worse scores on the Short Form-12 and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia instruments. After treatment, heartburn and regurgitation disappeared in 93 and 87% of the patients, respectively. The percentage of patients responding to PPI treatment was significantly higher (P<0.05) in those with heartburn than those without heartburn (96 vs. 86%) and in those with regurgitation than without regurgitation (95 vs. 83%), whereas no differences were observed in those with and without supraesophageal or dyspeptic symptoms.
CONCLUSION: Patients with typical GERD symptoms (heartburn and/or regurgitation) very frequently have dyspeptic and supraesophageal manifestations, which are related to a worse QoL but unrelated to PPI response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22330237     DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283512139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  15 in total

1.  Clinical characteristics and effectiveness of lansoprazole in Japanese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Kinoshita; Hiroto Miwa; Katsuyuki Sanada; Koji Miyata; Ken Haruma
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Impaired upper esophageal sphincter reflexes in patients with supraesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Arash Babaei; Mukund Venu; Sohrab Rahimi Naini; Jason Gonzaga; Ivan M Lang; Benson T Massey; Sudarshan Jadcherla; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Factors affecting response to proton pump inhibitor therapy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a multicenter prospective observational study.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Matsuhashi; Mineo Kudo; Norimasa Yoshida; Kazunari Murakami; Mototsugu Kato; Tsuyoshi Sanuki; Atsushi Oshio; Takashi Joh; Kazuhide Higuchi; Ken Haruma; Koji Nakada
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 7.527

4.  Prevention of esophagopharyngeal reflux by augmenting the upper esophageal sphincter pressure barrier.

Authors:  Reza Shaker; Arash Babaei; Sohrab R Naini
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  EAES recommendations for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Karl Hermann Fuchs; Benjamin Babic; Wolfram Breithaupt; Bernard Dallemagne; Abe Fingerhut; Edgar Furnee; Frank Granderath; Peter Horvath; Peter Kardos; Rudolph Pointner; Edoardo Savarino; Maud Van Herwaarden-Lindeboom; Giovanni Zaninotto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparative effect of the sites of anterior cervical pressure on the geometry of the upper esophageal sphincter high-pressure zone.

Authors:  Ling Mei; Hongmei Jiao; Tarun Sharma; Arshish Dua; Patrick Sanvanson; Sudarshan R Jadcherla; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Positive predictors for gastroesophageal reflux disease and the therapeutic response to proton-pump inhibitors.

Authors:  Valentin Becker; Stefan Grotz; Christoph Schlag; Simon Nennstiel; Analena Beitz; Bernhard Haller; Roland M Schmid; Alexander Meining; Monther Bajbouj
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Evaluation of upper esophageal sphincter in benign vocal lesions.

Authors:  Ertugrul Kibar; Omer Erdur; Kayhan Ozturk
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Structured management strategy based on the Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Questionnaire (GerdQ) vs. usual primary care for GERD: pooled analysis of five cluster-randomised European studies.

Authors:  J Ponce; V Garrigues; L Agréus; E Tabaglio; M Gschwantler; E Guallar; M Tafalla; J Nuevo; J Hatlebakk
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Comparison between the Reflux Finding Score and the Reflux Symptom Index in the Practice of Otorhinolaryngology.

Authors:  Heloisa Sobreira Nunes; José Antonio Pinto; Adma Roberta Zavanela; André Freitas Cavallini; Gabriel Santos Freitas; Fabiola Esteves Garcia
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.