BACKGROUND: The impulse oscillation system (IOS) offers significant value in the assessment of airway dynamics in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) because of minimal patient effort but measurement reproducibility in SCI is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate between-day reproducibility and the effect of posture on airway resistance [respiratory resistances at 5 Hz (R5) and 20 Hz (R20)] in subjects with tetraplegia, paraplegia and able-bodied controls. METHODS: Ten subjects with tetraplegia, 10 subjects with paraplegia and 11 able-bodied individuals were evaluated using IOS. Three 30 second trials were obtained in each while in the seated and supine position on Day 1, and repeated on Day 2. RESULTS: The within-day coefficient of variation (CV%) for R5 and R20 were comparable in the 3 study groups in the seated and supine positions. Compared to controls, the between-day CV% for the combined data was higher in subjects with tetraplegia and paraplegia for R5 seated, and was higher in subjects with tetraplegia for R5 supine. CONCLUSIONS: IOS has applicability to the study of within-day respiratory resistance in SCI. However, performing longer-term studies in subjects with tetraplegia and paraplegia may be problematic because of the greater variability for R5 when compared to able-bodied individuals.
BACKGROUND: The impulse oscillation system (IOS) offers significant value in the assessment of airway dynamics in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) because of minimal patient effort but measurement reproducibility in SCI is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate between-day reproducibility and the effect of posture on airway resistance [respiratory resistances at 5 Hz (R5) and 20 Hz (R20)] in subjects with tetraplegia, paraplegia and able-bodied controls. METHODS: Ten subjects with tetraplegia, 10 subjects with paraplegia and 11 able-bodied individuals were evaluated using IOS. Three 30 second trials were obtained in each while in the seated and supine position on Day 1, and repeated on Day 2. RESULTS: The within-day coefficient of variation (CV%) for R5 and R20 were comparable in the 3 study groups in the seated and supine positions. Compared to controls, the between-day CV% for the combined data was higher in subjects with tetraplegia and paraplegia for R5 seated, and was higher in subjects with tetraplegia for R5 supine. CONCLUSIONS: IOS has applicability to the study of within-day respiratory resistance in SCI. However, performing longer-term studies in subjects with tetraplegia and paraplegia may be problematic because of the greater variability for R5 when compared to able-bodied individuals.
Authors: Gregory J Schilero; Joshua C Hobson; Kamaldeep Singh; Ann M Spungen; William A Bauman; Miroslav Radulovic Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2016-11-03 Impact factor: 1.985