OBJECTIVE: To describe the course of limitations in activities over 5 years follow-up and identify predictors of future limitations in activities in elderly patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip or knee with moderate functional limitations. METHOD: A longitudinal cohort study with 5 years follow-up was conducted. Patients (n=288) were recruited at rehabilitation centers and hospitals. The main outcome measures were self-reported and performance-based limitations in activities. Prognostic factors were demographic and clinical data, body functions, comorbidity, cognitive functioning, avoidance of activity and social support. Measurements were conducted at baseline, 1, 2, 3 and 5 years follow-up. RESULTS: Both in patients with knee and hip OA, the course of limitations in activities remained fairly stable over a period of 5 years. Avoidance of activity, increased pain, more comorbidity, a higher age, a longer disease duration, a reduced muscle strength and range of joint motion at baseline predicted more future limitations in activities in patients with knee OA. In patients with hip OA, avoidance of activity, increased pain, more comorbidity, a higher age, a higher educational level and a reduced range of motion at baseline predicted more future limitations in activities. CONCLUSIONS: The course of limitations in activities remains fairly stable over a period of 5 years in elderly patients with hip or knee OA. However, at individual level there is considerable variation. Predictors of more future limitations in activities include avoidance of activity, increased pain, higher morbidity count, reduced range of motion, and a higher age.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the course of limitations in activities over 5 years follow-up and identify predictors of future limitations in activities in elderly patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip or knee with moderate functional limitations. METHOD: A longitudinal cohort study with 5 years follow-up was conducted. Patients (n=288) were recruited at rehabilitation centers and hospitals. The main outcome measures were self-reported and performance-based limitations in activities. Prognostic factors were demographic and clinical data, body functions, comorbidity, cognitive functioning, avoidance of activity and social support. Measurements were conducted at baseline, 1, 2, 3 and 5 years follow-up. RESULTS: Both in patients with knee and hip OA, the course of limitations in activities remained fairly stable over a period of 5 years. Avoidance of activity, increased pain, more comorbidity, a higher age, a longer disease duration, a reduced muscle strength and range of joint motion at baseline predicted more future limitations in activities in patients with knee OA. In patients with hip OA, avoidance of activity, increased pain, more comorbidity, a higher age, a higher educational level and a reduced range of motion at baseline predicted more future limitations in activities. CONCLUSIONS: The course of limitations in activities remains fairly stable over a period of 5 years in elderly patients with hip or knee OA. However, at individual level there is considerable variation. Predictors of more future limitations in activities include avoidance of activity, increased pain, higher morbidity count, reduced range of motion, and a higher age.
Authors: Stephen D Anton; Adam J Woods; Tetso Ashizawa; Diana Barb; Thomas W Buford; Christy S Carter; David J Clark; Ronald A Cohen; Duane B Corbett; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Vonetta Dotson; Natalie Ebner; Philip A Efron; Roger B Fillingim; Thomas C Foster; David M Gundermann; Anna-Maria Joseph; Christy Karabetian; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Todd M Manini; Michael Marsiske; Robert T Mankowski; Heather L Mutchie; Michael G Perri; Sanjay Ranka; Parisa Rashidi; Bhanuprasad Sandesara; Philip J Scarpace; Kimberly T Sibille; Laurence M Solberg; Shinichi Someya; Connie Uphold; Stephanie Wohlgemuth; Samuel Shangwu Wu; Marco Pahor Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: Jamie E Collins; Benjamin N Rome; Meghan E Daigle; Vladislav Lerner; Jeffrey N Katz; Elena Losina Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Bo Hu; Søren Thorgaard Skou; Barton L Wise; Glenn N Williams; Michael C Nevitt; Neil A Segal Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Jasmijn F M Holla; Diana C Sanchez-Ramirez; Marike van der Leeden; Johannes C F Ket; Leo D Roorda; Willem F Lems; Martijn P M Steultjens; Joost Dekker Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2014-05-20
Authors: Agnes J Smink; Cornelia H M van den Ende; Thea P M Vliet Vlieland; Johannes W J Bijlsma; Bart A Swierstra; Joke H Kortland; Theo B Voorn; Steven Teerenstra; Henk J Schers; Joost Dekker; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Britt Elin Øiestad; Daniel K White; Ross Booton; Jingbo Niu; Yuqing Zhang; Jim Torner; Cora E Lewis; Michael Nevitt; Michael LaValley; David T Felson Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 4.794