Literature DB >> 2232963

Evaluation of clinical decision aids--more to think about.

J Hilden1, J D Habbema.   

Abstract

Validation and clinical testing of medical decision aids is a hot topic at present. We state a few main points which, in our opinion, have not received the attention they deserve. Our main concerns have to do with the statistical design and analysis of field evaluation studies; with long-term effects; and with the interplay between medicine and the software industry. The points represent our reaction to a recent symposium on the topic, published in this special issue. We take the opportunity to supplement the papers at hand in various ways and, where we see a risk of misconceptions or poor practice becoming cemented, try to point out the proper course.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2232963     DOI: 10.3109/14639239009025275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Inform (Lond)        ISSN: 0307-7640


  4 in total

1.  Effectiveness of the Quick Medical Reference as a diagnostic tool.

Authors:  J B Lemaire; J P Schaefer; L A Martin; P Faris; M D Ainslie; R D Hull
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-09-21       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Reference standards, judges, and comparison subjects: roles for experts in evaluating system performance.

Authors:  George Hripcsak; Adam Wilcox
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Stepwise development of a clinical expert system in rheumatology.

Authors:  S Schewe; M A Schreiber
Journal:  Clin Investig       Date:  1993-02

4.  Evaluating the quality of a probabilistic diagnostic system using different inferencing strategies.

Authors:  Y C Li; P J Haug
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1993
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.