N Han 1 , J Y Zu , J Chai . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There may be distinct pathways for transmission of histaminergic and nonhistaminergic itch, but all scratching behaviours elicited by histamine-dependent and histamine-independent pruritogens are diminished when spinal bombesin-recognized neurones are ablated. AIM: To investigate whether there is a difference in transmission of spinal itch signals between histamine-induced itch and nonhistamine-induced itch after neurotoxic destruction of spinal bombesin-recognized neurones. METHODS: To ascertain the different relevance of spinal bombesin-recognized neurones in transmission of itch signals between these two classes of pruritogens, we determined the distribution of Fos-positive cells in the dorsal horn of spinal cord after stimulation with histamine (500 μg/site) and chloroquine (200 μg/site) in mice with spinal bombesin-recognized neurones ablated by intrathecal injection of bombesin-saporin (400 ng/5 μL). RESULTS: We found that after stimulation with both histamine and chloroquine, fewer Fos-positive cells were present in mice treated with bombesin-saporin compared with those treated with saporin alone. The reduction in Fos expression was greater with chloroquine than with histamine, and the distribution of Fos-positive cells was also different. We used biotin-labelled isolectin (IB)4, which labels one subset of C-fibres, and found that the percentages of Fos-positive cells in three areas (the dorsal to IB4-labelled region, the IB4-labelled region itself, and the ventral to IB4-labelled region) all changed significantly after intradermal injection of chloroquine, but not histamine, in mice treated with bombesin-saporin. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that spinal bombesin-recognized neurones are critical to both the histamine-dependent and histamine-independent pathways for itch, and that they mediate more nonhistaminergic than histaminergic sensation of itch in mice. © The Author(s). CED
BACKGROUND: There may be distinct pathways for transmission of histaminergic and nonhistaminergic itch , but all scratching behaviours elicited by histamine -dependent and histamine -independent pruritogens are diminished when spinal bombesin-recognized neurones are ablated. AIM: To investigate whether there is a difference in transmission of spinal itch signals between histamine -induced itch and nonhistamine -induced itch after neurotoxic destruction of spinal bombesin-recognized neurones. METHODS: To ascertain the different relevance of spinal bombesin-recognized neurones in transmission of itch signals between these two classes of pruritogens, we determined the distribution of Fos -positive cells in the dorsal horn of spinal cord after stimulation with histamine (500 μg/site) and chloroquine (200 μg/site) in mice with spinal bombesin-recognized neurones ablated by intrathecal injection of bombesin-saporin (400 ng/5 μL). RESULTS: We found that after stimulation with both histamine and chloroquine , fewer Fos -positive cells were present in mice treated with bombesin-saporin compared with those treated with saporin alone. The reduction in Fos expression was greater with chloroquine than with histamine , and the distribution of Fos -positive cells was also different. We used biotin -labelled isolectin (IB)4, which labels one subset of C-fibres, and found that the percentages of Fos -positive cells in three areas (the dorsal to IB4 -labelled region, the IB4 -labelled region itself, and the ventral to IB4 -labelled region) all changed significantly after intradermal injection of chloroquine , but not histamine , in mice treated with bombesin-saporin . CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that spinal bombesin-recognized neurones are critical to both the histamine -dependent and histamine -independent pathways for itch , and that they mediate more nonhistaminergic than histaminergic sensation of itch in mice . © The Author(s). CED
© 2012 British Association of Dermatologists.
Entities: Chemical
Disease
Gene
Species
Mesh: See more »
Substances: See more »
Year: 2012
PMID: 22329438 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2011.04314.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Dermatol ISSN: 0307-6938 Impact factor: 3.470