Literature DB >> 22328206

Population analyses of efficacy and safety of ABT-594 in subjects with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain.

Sandeep Dutta1, Balakrishna S Hosmane, Walid M Awni.   

Abstract

ABT-594, a neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ligand, is 30- to 100-fold more potent than morphine in animal models of nociceptive and neuropathic pain. Efficacy and safety of ABT-594 in subjects with painful diabetic polyneuropathy was evaluated in a phase 2 study. The objective of this work was to use a nonlinear mixed effects model-based approach for characterizing the relationship between dose and response (efficacy and safety) of ABT-594. Subjects (N = 266) were randomized into four groups in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 7-week study to receive twice daily regimens of placebo or 150, 225, and 300 μg of ABT-594. The primary efficacy variable, pain score (11-point Likert scale), was assessed on five occasions. The probability of change from baseline pain score of ≥1, ≥2, and ≥3 was modeled using cumulative logistic regression with dose and days of treatment as explanatory variables. The incidence of five most frequently occurring adverse events (AEs) was modeled using linear logistic regression. ABT-594 ED(50) values (improvement in 50% of subjects) for improvement in pain scores of ≥1, ≥2, and ≥3 were 50, 215, and 340 μg, respectively, for the average number of days (33) on treatment. The rank order of ED(50) values for AEs was nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache, and abnormal dreams; nicotine users were less sensitive to AEs. Population pharmacodynamic models developed to characterize the improvement in pain score and incidence of adverse events indicate an approximately twofold separation between the ED(50) values for efficacy and AEs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22328206      PMCID: PMC3326158          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-012-9328-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  14 in total

1.  Pain.

Authors:  C J Woolf
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.996

2.  ABT-594 [(R)-5-(2-azetidinylmethoxy)-2-chloropyridine]: a novel, orally effective antinociceptive agent acting via neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: II. In vivo characterization.

Authors:  A W Bannon; M W Decker; P Curzon; M J Buckley; D J Kim; R J Radek; J K Lynch; J T Wasicak; N H Lin; W H Arnold; M W Holladay; M Williams; S P Arneric
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 3.  Treatment of chronic non-cancer pain.

Authors:  Dennis C Turk; Hilary D Wilson; Alex Cahana
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  A critical review of controlled clinical trials for peripheral neuropathic pain and complex regional pain syndromes.

Authors:  Wade S Kingery
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Population pharmacodynamic model for ketorolac analgesia.

Authors:  J W Mandema; D R Stanski
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Evidence-based data from animal and human experimental studies on pain relief with antidepressants: a structured review.

Authors:  D A Fishbain; R Cutler; H L Rosomoff; R S Rosomoff
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.750

7.  EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment.

Authors:  G Cruccu; P Anand; N Attal; L Garcia-Larrea; M Haanpää; E Jørum; J Serra; T S Jensen
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.089

8.  A new approach to the analysis of analgesic drug trials, illustrated with bromfenac data.

Authors:  L B Sheiner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 9.  Diabetic polyneuropathy. Risk factors, patterns of presentation, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Ann Noelle Poncelet
Journal:  Geriatrics       Date:  2003-06

10.  Responder analysis for pain relief and numbers needed to treat in a meta-analysis of etoricoxib osteoarthritis trials: bridging a gap between clinical trials and clinical practice.

Authors:  R A Moore; O A Moore; S Derry; P M Peloso; A R Gammaitoni; H Wang
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 19.103

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in neuropathic and inflammatory pain.

Authors:  Arik J Hone; J Michael McIntosh
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 4.124

2.  Nicotine Evoked Currents in Human Primary Sensory Neurons.

Authors:  Xiulin Zhang; Jane E Hartung; Robert L Friedman; H Richard Koerber; Inna Belfer; Michael S Gold
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Nicotinic receptors in neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Inmaculada Posadas; Beatriz López-Hernández; Valentín Ceña
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 7.363

Review 4.  Natural compounds interacting with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: from low-molecular weight ones to peptides and proteins.

Authors:  Denis Kudryavtsev; Irina Shelukhina; Catherine Vulfius; Tatyana Makarieva; Valentin Stonik; Maxim Zhmak; Igor Ivanov; Igor Kasheverov; Yuri Utkin; Victor Tsetlin
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 4.546

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.