Literature DB >> 22327990

Robotic remote presence technology in the surgical intensive care unit.

John McNelis1, Garry J Schwall, John F Collins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A national shortage of intensivists coupled with an increased demand for 24/7 intensive care unit (ICU) attending coverage poses staffing problems. To extend physician availability, many institutions have adopted varying forms of remote presence technology (RPT). The authors examine their experience with robotic technology to extend physician presence.
METHODS: The RP-7 experience (InTouch Health, Santa Barbara, CA) was examined from March 1, 2008, to December 31, 2010. Intensivists were on site daily from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM. Evening rounds were conducted by either RP-7 or telephone. Data were acquired after each session and included demographic data, patients evaluated, interventions made, nighttime discussions regarding plan of care, signal drops, time spent, subsequent calls, unexpected events, and a user evaluation. In addition, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II data, length of stay (LOS), and mortality data were tracked for each group. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was done using Student's t test.
RESULTS: The two groups did not differ in regard to age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, or mortality. The RP-7 group demonstrated a decreased hospital and ICU LOS and less subsequent unexpected events. RPT rounds were longer, resulted in more interventions, intensivists received less subsequent calls, and users reported a higher rate of satisfaction with RP-7.
CONCLUSIONS: Communication between attending physician and staff is enhanced by RPT. In addition, hospital and ICU LOS are improved with RPT. Although the two groups do not differ in mortality, improved patient safety was inferred by the decreased number of untoward events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22327990     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31822f7d3b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  6 in total

Review 1.  Rural and remote care: Overcoming the challenges of distance.

Authors:  Donna Goodridge; Darcy Marciniuk
Journal:  Chron Respir Dis       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 2.444

2.  Robotic Telepresence in a Medical Intensive Care Unit--Clinicians' Perceptions.

Authors:  Mirna Becevic; Martina A Clarke; Mohammed M Alnijoumi; Harjyot S Sohal; Suzanne A Boren; Min S Kim; Rachel Mutrux
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2015-07-01

3.  Telerounding: A scoping review and implications for future healthcare practice.

Authors:  Andrew C Griggs; Crystal M Fausett; Richard J Simonson; Kimberly N Williams; Tiffany M Bisbey; Elizabeth H Lazzara; Joseph R Keebler; Deborah DiazGranados; Vimal K Mishra; Eric J Thomas; Eduardo Salas
Journal:  Hum Factors Healthc       Date:  2022-04-08

4.  Use of Robots in Critical Care: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rachel Teng; Yichen Ding; Kay Choong See
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 7.076

Review 5.  Use of robotics in colon and rectal surgery.

Authors:  Michael J Pucci; Alec C Beekley
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-03

6.  The use of remote presence for health care delivery in a northern Inuit community: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Ivar Mendez; Michael Jong; Debra Keays-White; Gail Turner
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 1.228

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.