Literature DB >> 22327892

Simplifying cheek reconstruction: a review of over 400 cases.

Emily D Rapstine1, William J Knaus, James F Thornton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cheek is a vast, well-vascularized facial subunit defined by the preauricular crease laterally, the mandible inferiorly, the lips and nasolabial fold medially, and the orbit-cheek crease and zygomatic arch superiorly. Reconstruction of the cheek commonly takes advantage of skin laxity in older patients and the relaxed skin tension lines of the face. Poor reconstructive techniques can cause or exacerbate significant deformities, especially in the oral and ocular regions.
METHODS: Four hundred twenty-two cases of post-Mohs' cheek reconstruction were reviewed retrospectively. All cases were performed sequentially over 10 years by the senior author (J.F.T.). Indications, techniques, postoperative care, complications, and patient characteristics (e.g., age, sex, medical history, defect size, and skin quality) were taken into consideration for each case.
RESULTS: The procedures used for cheek reconstruction included direct closure (53 percent), cervicofacial advancement flaps (19 percent), perialar crescentic advancement flaps (8 percent), full-thickness skin grafting (8 percent), V-Y advancement flaps (2 percent), and free flaps (1 percent). Although no attempt was made to modify patients' anticoagulation status before surgery, no hematomas were reported. Nine patients had multiple procedures for cancer recurrence or new defects, and all but four operations were performed at a university hospital outpatient surgery center. Seventeen total complications were noted from distal flap necrosis (n = 2), ectropion (n = 7), wound healing (n = 7), and compromised vascular supply (n = 1).
CONCLUSION: Knowledge of aesthetic considerations and appropriate use of operative techniques yield optimum cheek reconstruction defined by successful wound closure, thoughtful scar placement, and minimal postoperative complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22327892     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824ecac7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  8 in total

1.  Treatment of post-surgical scars of cheek's mucosa with Er, Cr: YSGG laser.

Authors:  A Albanese; M E Licata; G Giannatempo; D Ciavarella; G Campisi
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2013-10-24

Review 2.  Facial Skin Cancer Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jesse D Meaike; Ryan M Dickey; Elizabeth Killion; Erica L Bartlett; Rodger H Brown
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 3.  Use of Biologic Agents for Lip and Cheek Reconstruction.

Authors:  Monal Depani; Andrew M Ferry; Andrew E Grush; Tanir A Moreno; Lloyd M Jones; James F Thornton
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 2.195

Review 4.  Simplifying Lip Reconstruction: An Algorithmic Approach.

Authors:  Kyle J Sanniec; Jourdan A Carboy; James F Thornton
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Revisiting closure options for heavily irradiated tissue following Mohs excision: A case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Pouya Entezami; Shervin Aminpour
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2015-01-23

Review 6.  Treatment of Non-melanoma Skin Cancers in the Absence of Mohs Micrographic Surgery.

Authors:  Andrew M Ferry; Shayan M Sarrami; Pierce C Hollier; Caitlin F Gerich; James F Thornton
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-12-22

7.  Revisiting Rhombic Flaps for Aesthetic Facial Resurfacing: Addressing a Surgical Conundrum.

Authors:  Neeraj Kant Agrawal
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2021 Jul-Sep

8.  Control of the Suborbital Cheek in Pediatric Patients: Working in the Deep Plane.

Authors:  Ara A Salibian; Barry M Zide
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-11-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.