Rachel P Urrutia1, John M Thorp. 1. Division of Women's Primary Care, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. rmpera@gmail.com
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Vitamin D is part of a complex steroid hormone system long known to be involved in bone metabolism. Recently, vitamin D has been implicated in physiologic processes as diverse as vascular health, immune function, metabolism and placental function. This review summarizes the current evidence for the role of vitamin D in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes A systematic review of articles published in PubMed between May 2010 and October 2011 was undertaken using key words for vitamin D and pregnancy. Seventy-eight studies were reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: The biologic evidence regarding a role for vitamin D in reproductive outcomes is strong, and rates of vitamin D deficiency may be high among pregnant women. However, no consensus exists regarding optimum vitamin D levels in pregnancy or standard measurement of vitamin D deficiency. Clinical studies establishing an association between vitamin D levels and adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, low birthweight, preterm labor, cesarean delivery and infectious diseases have conflicting results. This is likely due to a paucity of randomized trials, heterogeneity of populations studied and low sample size with poor adjustment for confounding among observational studies. SUMMARY: Further research should focus on defining optimum 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels in pregnancy as well as among various subgroups of the population. Randomized trials are needed to determine whether vitamin D supplementation can improve pregnancy outcomes. Currently, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Institute of Medicine recommend 600 IU of daily vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy to support maternal and fetal bone metabolism.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Vitamin D is part of a complex steroid hormone system long known to be involved in bone metabolism. Recently, vitamin D has been implicated in physiologic processes as diverse as vascular health, immune function, metabolism and placental function. This review summarizes the current evidence for the role of vitamin D in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes A systematic review of articles published in PubMed between May 2010 and October 2011 was undertaken using key words for vitamin D and pregnancy. Seventy-eight studies were reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: The biologic evidence regarding a role for vitamin D in reproductive outcomes is strong, and rates of vitamin D deficiency may be high among pregnant women. However, no consensus exists regarding optimum vitamin D levels in pregnancy or standard measurement of vitamin D deficiency. Clinical studies establishing an association between vitamin D levels and adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, low birthweight, preterm labor, cesarean delivery and infectious diseases have conflicting results. This is likely due to a paucity of randomized trials, heterogeneity of populations studied and low sample size with poor adjustment for confounding among observational studies. SUMMARY: Further research should focus on defining optimum 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels in pregnancy as well as among various subgroups of the population. Randomized trials are needed to determine whether vitamin D supplementation can improve pregnancy outcomes. Currently, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Institute of Medicine recommend 600 IU of daily vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy to support maternal and fetal bone metabolism.
Authors: Katie N Evans; Lisa Nguyen; Junny Chan; Barbara A Innes; Judith N Bulmer; Mark D Kilby; Martin Hewison Journal: Biol Reprod Date: 2006-09-06 Impact factor: 4.285
Authors: M Shahbazi; M Jeddi-Tehrani; M Zareie; A Salek-Moghaddam; M M Akhondi; M Bahmanpoor; M R Sadeghi; A H Zarnani Journal: Placenta Date: 2011-07-18 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Lisa M Bodnar; Janet M Catov; Joseph M Zmuda; Margaret E Cooper; Meredith S Parrott; James M Roberts; Mary L Marazita; Hyagriv N Simhan Journal: J Nutr Date: 2010-03-03 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Stuart A Hamilton; Rebecca McNeil; Bruce W Hollis; Deborah J Davis; Joyce Winkler; Carolina Cook; Gloria Warner; Betty Bivens; Patrick McShane; Carol L Wagner Journal: Int J Endocrinol Date: 2010-12-09 Impact factor: 3.257
Authors: Julia L Finkelstein; Eva K Pressman; Elizabeth M Cooper; Tera R Kent; Haim Y Bar; Kimberly O O'Brien Journal: Reprod Sci Date: 2014-11-02 Impact factor: 3.060
Authors: Gayle C Windham; Michelle Pearl; Meredith C Anderson; Victor Poon; Darryl Eyles; Karen L Jones; Kristen Lyall; Martin Kharrazi; Lisa A Croen Journal: Autism Res Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 5.216
Authors: Vania B Rezende; Valeria C Sandrim; Ana C Palei; Lorena Machado; Ricardo C Cavalli; Geraldo Duarte; Jose E Tanus-Santos Journal: Mol Biol Rep Date: 2012-10-07 Impact factor: 2.316
Authors: David A Fried; Jane Rhyu; Karen Odato; Heather Blunt; Margaret R Karagas; Diane Gilbert-Diamond Journal: Nutr Rev Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 7.110