Literature DB >> 2232762

Recognition of voiceless fricatives by normal and hearing-impaired subjects.

F G Zeng1, C W Turner.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the sufficient perceptual cues used in the recognition of four voiceless fricative consonants [s, f, theta, integral of] followed by the same vowel [i:] in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adult listeners. Subjects identified the four CV speech tokens in a closed-set response task across a range of presentation levels. Fricative syllables were either produced by a human speaker in the natural stimulus set, or generated by a computer program in the synthetic stimulus set. By comparing conditions in which the subjects were presented with equivalent degrees of audibility for individual fricatives, it was possible to isolate the factor of lack of audibility from that of loss of suprathreshold discriminability. Results indicate that (a) the friction burst portion may serve as a sufficient cue for correct recognition of voiceless fricatives by normal-hearing subjects, whereas the more intense CV transition portion, though it may not be necessary, can also assist these subjects to distinguish place information, particularly at low presentation levels; (b) hearing-impaired subjects achieved close-to-normal recognition performance when given equivalent degrees of audibility of the frication cue, but they obtained poorer-than-normal performance if only given equivalent degrees of audibility of the transition cue; (c) the difficulty that hearing-impaired subjects have in perceiving fricatives under normal circumstances may be due to two factors: the lack of audibility of the frication cue and the loss of discriminability of the transition cue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2232762     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3303.440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  8 in total

1.  Individual sensitivity to spectral and temporal cues in listeners with hearing impairment.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Richard A Wright; Michael C Blackburn; Rachael Tatman; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Distorted Tonotopy Severely Degrades Neural Representations of Connected Speech in Noise following Acoustic Trauma.

Authors:  Satyabrata Parida; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  The contribution of obstruent consonants and acoustic landmarks to speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Ning Li; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of frequency compression and frequency transposition on fricative and affricate perception in listeners with normal hearing and mild to moderate hearing loss.

Authors:  Joshua M Alexander; Judy G Kopun; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Aided and unaided speech perception by older hearing impaired listeners.

Authors:  David L Woods; Tanya Arbogast; Zoe Doss; Masood Younus; Timothy J Herron; E William Yund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The effect of aging on identification of Mandarin consonants in normal and whisper registers.

Authors:  Min Xu; Jing Shao; Hongwei Ding; Lan Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-12

7.  Acoustic characteristics of fricatives, amplitude of formants and clarity of speech produced without and with a medical mask.

Authors:  Duy Duong Nguyen; Antonia Chacon; Christopher Payten; Rebecca Black; Meet Sheth; Patricia McCabe; Daniel Novakovic; Catherine Madill
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.909

8.  Classification of fricative consonants for speech enhancement in hearing devices.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Ala Mullangi; Kostas Kokkinakis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.