Literature DB >> 22327445

Outcomes of slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated with in situ pinning.

A Noelle Larson1, Rafael J Sierra, Elizabeth M Yu, Robert T Trousdale, Anthony A Stans.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous long-term studies have shown good outcomes for most patients after in situ pinning of slipped capital femoral epiphyses (SCFE). However, concern is growing about the effects of leaving the epiphysis in a nonanatomic position. We undertook a retrospective study to carefully document patient-reported outcomes and need for additional surgery after in situ pinning of SCFE. Further, we sought to determine the risk factors for persistent pain and dysfunction after in situ pinning.
METHODS: Between 1965 and 2005, 146 patients (176 hips) with SCFE underwent in situ pinning at a tertiary referral center. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed for slip characteristics and need for subsequent surgery. Patient-reported outcome measures were collected by mailed survey. Mean follow-up was 16 years (range, 2 to 43 y).
RESULTS: Twenty-one hips (12%) underwent reconstructive surgery for persistent symptoms, including femoral osteotomy (11), surgical hip dislocation (2), and total hip arthroplasty (8). Mild slips, as well as moderate and severe slips, were treated with reconstructive surgery, including total hip arthroplasty. Of the remaining hips, 33% were painful with a mean overall visual analog score of 2.4 (range, 0 to 10). Mean outcome scores were as follows: Harris Hip Score 90 (max. 100); Hip Dysfunction Osteoarthritis Outcome score 411 (max. 500); UCLA Activity Score 8 (max. 10); and Marx Activity Score 5 (max. 16).
CONCLUSIONS: Reconstructive surgery was performed in 12% of hips. Patients with mild, moderate, and severe slips underwent arthroplasty for degenerative changes. Persistent mild pain was common in one third of patients treated with in situ pinning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study, case series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22327445     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318246efcb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  21 in total

1.  Emerging concepts in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: editorial comment.

Authors:  Michael B Millis; Ira Zaltz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  High Survivorship and Little Osteoarthritis at 10-year Followup in SCFE Patients Treated With a Modified Dunn Procedure.

Authors:  Kai Ziebarth; Milan Milosevic; Till D Lerch; Simon D Steppacher; Theddy Slongo; Klaus A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Patients with unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis have antecedent symptoms.

Authors:  Thomas G McPartland; Wudbhav N Sankar; Young-Jo Kim; Michael B Millis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Modified Dunn Procedure is Superior to In Situ Pinning for Short-term Clinical and Radiographic Improvement in Severe Stable SCFE.

Authors:  Eduardo N Novais; Mary K Hill; Patrick M Carry; Travis C Heare; Ernest L Sink
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Evolving Understanding of and Treatment Approaches to Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.

Authors:  James D Wylie; Eduardo N Novais
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-06

6.  Risk factors for early symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement following in situ fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Melissa M Allen; Ramesh B Ghanta; Matthew Lahey; Scott B Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-04-01

7.  The fate of hips that are not prophylactically pinned after unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Yaser M K Baghdadi; A Noelle Larson; Rafael J Sierra; Hamlet A Peterson; Anthony A Stans
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: relevant pathophysiological findings with open surgery.

Authors:  Kai Ziebarth; Michael Leunig; Theddy Slongo; Young-Jo Kim; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Case reports: acetabular damage after mild slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Cara Beth Lee; Travis Matheney; Yi-Meng Yen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Slipped upper femoral epiphysis: Outcome after in situ fixation and capital realignment technique.

Authors:  Sanjay Arora; Vivek Dutt; Thomas Palocaren; Vrisha Madhuri
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.