M Scheel1, T Prokscha, M Bayerl, J Gallinat, C Montag. 1. Department of Neuroradiology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany. michael.scheel@charite.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diffusion Tensor Imaging studies have repeatedly shown a decrease of the fractional anisotropy (FA) parameter in patients with schizophrenia. This has been interpreted as a disturbed microstructural integrity of white matter. However, FA is a relative parameter that is derived from eigenvalues of the diffusion tensor and FA reductions may be the result of decreases in parallel diffusivity (PD) or increases in radial diffusivity (RD). Despite the well-established FA reduction in schizophrenia, little is known what this reduction is based on. METHODS: Seventeen patients with schizophrenia were scanned with a DTI protocol and compared to a group of healthy control subjects. In addition to an FA comparison, a detailed analysis of PD and RD values was performed with two approaches to localize changes in diffusion values, i.e. a voxel-based analysis and an anatomically based tract specific analysis. RESULTS: We found significantly decreased FA values in the patient group when compared to healthy controls. FA decreases were based on an increase in RD, while we observed no significant changes of PD. These changes were predominantly localized in frontal and temporal areas. CONCLUSION: RD increases as the underlying change in FA decreases is suggestive of desintegration of myelin, which is in line with histopathological studies suggesting a disturbed myelination in schizophrenia.
BACKGROUND: Diffusion Tensor Imaging studies have repeatedly shown a decrease of the fractional anisotropy (FA) parameter in patients with schizophrenia. This has been interpreted as a disturbed microstructural integrity of white matter. However, FA is a relative parameter that is derived from eigenvalues of the diffusion tensor and FA reductions may be the result of decreases in parallel diffusivity (PD) or increases in radial diffusivity (RD). Despite the well-established FA reduction in schizophrenia, little is known what this reduction is based on. METHODS: Seventeen patients with schizophrenia were scanned with a DTI protocol and compared to a group of healthy control subjects. In addition to an FA comparison, a detailed analysis of PD and RD values was performed with two approaches to localize changes in diffusion values, i.e. a voxel-based analysis and an anatomically based tract specific analysis. RESULTS: We found significantly decreased FA values in the patient group when compared to healthy controls. FA decreases were based on an increase in RD, while we observed no significant changes of PD. These changes were predominantly localized in frontal and temporal areas. CONCLUSION: RD increases as the underlying change in FA decreases is suggestive of desintegration of myelin, which is in line with histopathological studies suggesting a disturbed myelination in schizophrenia.
Authors: Christian Clemm von Hohenberg; Ofer Pasternak; Marek Kubicki; Thomas Ballinger; Mai-Anh Vu; Tali Swisher; Katie Green; Michelle Giwerc; Brian Dahlben; Jill M Goldstein; Tsung-Ung W Woo; Tracey L Petryshen; Raquelle I Mesholam-Gately; Kristen A Woodberry; Heidi W Thermenos; Christoph Mulert; Robert W McCarley; Larry J Seidman; Martha E Shenton Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2013-06-04 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Lena K L Oestreich; Amanda E Lyall; Ofer Pasternak; Zora Kikinis; Dominick T Newell; Peter Savadjiev; Sylvain Bouix; Martha E Shenton; Marek Kubicki; Thomas J Whitford; Simon McCarthy-Jones Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: M Kubicki; M E Shenton; P K Maciejewski; P E Pelavin; K J Hawley; T Ballinger; T Swisher; G A Jabbar; H W Thermenos; M S Keshavan; L J Seidman; L E Delisi Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2013-06-22 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Sean N Hatton; Jim Lagopoulos; Daniel F Hermens; Ian B Hickie; Elizabeth Scott; Maxwell R Bennett Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 6.186
Authors: W Miao; J Li; M Tang; J Xian; W Li; Z Liu; S Liu; B A Sabel; Z Wang; H He Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-12-28 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Konasale M Prasad; Catherine H Upton; Claudiu S Schirda; Vishwajit L Nimgaonkar; Matcheri S Keshavan Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2014-10-30 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: C J Aine; L Sanfratello; J C Adair; J E Knoefel; C Qualls; S L Lundy; A Caprihan; D Stone; J M Stephen Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-09-20 Impact factor: 6.556