PURPOSE: Cultural views are purported to be critical barriers to the use of epidural anesthesia during childbirth in Japan, even though it is not routinely available. We sought to understand the importance of the asserted cultural barriers for Japanese women living in Michigan in the United States where access to epidural anesthesia is routine. METHODS: We used a mixed-methods approach including self-administered, cross-sectional mail surveys and semi-structured qualitative interviews. Participants were Japanese women who received prenatal care at the University of Michigan Japanese Family Health Program. RESULTS: Of 78 participants in the mail survey, 63% used epidural anesthesia. Positive influences to have epidural anesthesia came from friends (58%), husbands (42%), and knowledge of the epidural anesthesia experiences of others (50%). Seventeen respondents participated in qualitative interviews. Most had learned little about epidural anesthesia while living in Japan, and some respondents had heard unsettling rumors. Many mentioned obtaining their first detailed knowledge about epidural anesthesia from friends in the United States, and expressed fear or concerns about the side effects of anesthesia. Thirteen out of fourteen interviewed participants who used or wanted epidural anesthesia expressed a desire to use it for the next childbirth. CONCLUSIONS: While Japanese women in this United States setting considered previously reported cultural barriers to epidural anesthesia for birth pain, many chose to have it during their labor. This finding implicates limited access as a barrier at least as important as cultural barriers to epidural anesthesia use in Japan.
PURPOSE: Cultural views are purported to be critical barriers to the use of epidural anesthesia during childbirth in Japan, even though it is not routinely available. We sought to understand the importance of the asserted cultural barriers for Japanese women living in Michigan in the United States where access to epidural anesthesia is routine. METHODS: We used a mixed-methods approach including self-administered, cross-sectional mail surveys and semi-structured qualitative interviews. Participants were Japanese women who received prenatal care at the University of Michigan Japanese Family Health Program. RESULTS: Of 78 participants in the mail survey, 63% used epidural anesthesia. Positive influences to have epidural anesthesia came from friends (58%), husbands (42%), and knowledge of the epidural anesthesia experiences of others (50%). Seventeen respondents participated in qualitative interviews. Most had learned little about epidural anesthesia while living in Japan, and some respondents had heard unsettling rumors. Many mentioned obtaining their first detailed knowledge about epidural anesthesia from friends in the United States, and expressed fear or concerns about the side effects of anesthesia. Thirteen out of fourteen interviewed participants who used or wanted epidural anesthesia expressed a desire to use it for the next childbirth. CONCLUSIONS: While Japanese women in this United States setting considered previously reported cultural barriers to epidural anesthesia for birth pain, many chose to have it during their labor. This finding implicates limited access as a barrier at least as important as cultural barriers to epidural anesthesia use in Japan.
Authors: K Nagaya; M D Fetters; M Ishikawa; T Kubo; T Koyanagi; Y Saito; H Sameshima; M Sugimoto; K Takagi; Y Chiba; H Honda; M Mukubo; M Kawamura; S Satoh; R Neki Journal: JAMA Date: 2000 May 24-31 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Lawrence Leeman; Patricia Fontaine; Valerie King; Michael C Klein; Stephen Ratcliffe Journal: Am Fam Physician Date: 2003-09-15 Impact factor: 3.292