Literature DB >> 22327135

Allo-SCT for AML and MDS with treosulfan compared with BU-based regimens: reduced toxicity vs reduced intensity.

A Shimoni1, N Shem-Tov, Y Volchek, I Danylesko, R Yerushalmi, A Nagler.   

Abstract

Allo-SCT with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) results in lower non-relapse mortality (NRM), but higher relapse rate than myeloablative conditioning (MAC) in AML/myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Novel regimens with intensive anti-leukemic activity, but with limited toxicity will be of benefit. In all, 85 patients with AML/MDS, not eligible for MAC, were given fludarabine-treosulfan conditioning (FT). Outcomes were compared with those in patients given fludarabine-BU RIC (FB2, n=106) or reduced-toxicity (RTC) conditioning (FB4, fludarabine and myeloablative BU dose, n=85). The 5-year NRM was 29%, 20% and 18% after FT, FB2 and FB4, respectively (P=NS). Multivariate analysis (MVA) identified comorbidity score (HCT-CI) >2 and advanced disease as adverse factors with no independent impact of regimen. The 5-year relapse rate was 36%, 47% and 40%, respectively (P=0.17). MVA identified advanced disease as the major adverse factor, while FT had significantly lower relapse rate (hazard ratio 0.6, P=0.03). The 5-year survival (OS) was 37% with advanced disease. HCT-CI >2 and age ≥ 50 were found as adverse factors. The 5-year OS was 46%, 44% and 50% after FT, FB2 and FB4 in early-intermediate-stage disease (P=NS) and 33%, 9% and 28% in advanced disease, respectively (P=0.02). FT is an RTC regimen with intensive anti-leukemia effect in MAC non-eligible patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22327135     DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2012.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  10 in total

Review 1.  Up-to-date tools for risk assessment before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  M Elsawy; M L Sorror
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  Treosulfan, fludarabine, and 2-Gy total body irradiation followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Boglarka Gyurkocza; Jonathan Gutman; Eneida R Nemecek; Merav Bar; Filippo Milano; Aravind Ramakrishnan; Bart Scott; Min Fang; Brent Wood; John M Pagel; Joachim Baumgart; Colleen Delaney; Richard T Maziarz; Brenda M Sandmaier; Elihu H Estey; Frederick R Appelbaum; Barry E Storer; Hans Joachim Deeg
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Reduced-intensity and myeloablative conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Wen Zeng; Lifang Huang; Fankai Meng; Zeming Liu; Jianfeng Zhou; Hanying Sun
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-11-15

4.  A simplified method for detection of N-terminal valine adducts in patients receiving treosulfan.

Authors:  Gunnar Boysen; Avichai Shimoni; Ivetta Danylesko; Nira Varda-Bloom; Arnon Nagler
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Comparative study of treosulfan plus Fludarabine (FT14) with busulfan plus Fludarabine (FB4) for acute myeloid leukemia in first or second complete remission: An analysis from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP).

Authors:  Eleni Gavriilaki; Myriam Labopin; Ioanna Sakellari; Urpu Salmenniemi; Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha; Victoria Potter; Ana Berceanu; Alessandro Rambaldi; Inken Hilgendorf; Nicolaus Kröger; Stephan Mielke; Tsila Zuckerman; Jaime Sanz; Alessandro Busca; Hakan Ozdogu; Achilles Anagnostopoulos; Bipin Savani; Sebastian Giebel; Ali Bazarbachi; Alexandros Spyridonidis; Arnon Nagler; Mohamad Mohty
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 5.174

6.  Fludarabine and treosulfan compared with other reduced-intensity conditioning regimens for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoid malignancies.

Authors:  R Yerushalmi; N Shem-Tov; I Danylesko; A Avigdor; A Nagler; A Shimoni
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  Fludarabine-treosulfan compared to thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine or FLAMSA as conditioning regimen for patients with primary refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: a study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT).

Authors:  Francesco Saraceni; Myriam Labopin; Arne Brecht; Nicolaus Kröger; Matthias Eder; Johanna Tischer; Hélène Labussière-Wallet; Hermann Einsele; Dietrich Beelen; Donald Bunjes; Dietger Niederwieser; Tilmann Bochtler; Bipin N Savani; Mohamad Mohty; Arnon Nagler
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 17.388

8.  Long-Term Outcomes of Treosulfan- vs. Busulfan-Based Conditioning Regimen for Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Before Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sheng Zhu; Gang Liu; Jing Liu; Qiuying Chen; Zhiqiang Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Treosulfan-Based Conditioning Regimen Prior to Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: Long-Term Results From a Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Lorenzo Lazzari; Annalisa Ruggeri; Maria Teresa Lupo Stanghellini; Sara Mastaglio; Carlo Messina; Fabio Giglio; Alessandro Lorusso; Tommaso Perini; Simona Piemontese; Magda Marcatti; Francesca Lorentino; Elisabetta Xue; Daniela Clerici; Consuelo Corti; Massimo Bernardi; Andrea Assanelli; Raffaella Greco; Fabio Ciceri; Jacopo Peccatori
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Older Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Jodi J Lipof; Kah Poh Loh; Kristen O'Dwyer; Jane L Liesveld
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 6.639

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.