Literature DB >> 22326623

The word-length effect in acquired alexia, and real and virtual hemianopia.

Claire A Sheldon1, Mathias Abegg, Alla Sekunova, Jason J S Barton.   

Abstract

A word-length effect is often described in pure alexia, with reading time proportional to the number of letters in a word. Given the frequent association of right hemianopia with pure alexia, it is uncertain whether and how much of the word-length effect may be attributable to the hemifield loss. To isolate the contribution of the visual field defect, we simulated hemianopia in healthy subjects with a gaze-contingent paradigm during an eye-tracking experiment. We found a minimal word-length effect of 14 ms/letter for full-field viewing, which increased to 38 ms/letter in right hemianopia and to 31 ms/letter in left hemianopia. We found a correlation between mean reading time and the slope of the word-length effect in hemianopic conditions. The 95% upper prediction limits for the word-length effect were 51 ms/letter in subjects with full visual fields and 161 ms/letter with simulated right hemianopia. These limits, which can be considered diagnostic criteria for an alexic word-length effect, were consistent with the reading performance of six patients with diagnoses based independently on perimetric and imaging data: two patients with probable hemianopic dyslexia, and four with alexia and lesions of the left fusiform gyrus, two with and two without hemianopia. Two of these patients also showed reduction of the word-length effect over months, one with and one without a reading rehabilitation program. Our findings clarify the magnitude of the word-length effect that originates from hemianopia alone, and show that the criteria for a word-length effect indicative of alexia differ according to the degree of associated hemifield loss.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22326623     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  9 in total

1.  Learning to read upside-down: a study of perceptual expertise and its acquisition.

Authors:  Elsa Ahlén; Charlotte S Hills; Hashim M Hanif; Cristina Rubino; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  An inability to learn to read caused by shaken baby syndrome.

Authors:  Leonardo Bevilacqua; Adam Kuczynski; Merle James-Galton; Alex P Leff
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-04-28

3.  Treatment for Alexia With Agraphia Following Left Ventral Occipito-Temporal Damage: Strengthening Orthographic Representations Common to Reading and Spelling.

Authors:  Esther S Kim; Kindle Rising; Steven Z Rapcsak; Pélagie M Beeson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The impact of simulated hemianopia on visual search for faces, words, and cars.

Authors:  Vahideh Manouchehri; Andrea Albonico; Jennifer Hemström; Sarra Djouab; Hyeongmin Kim; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Dynamic gaze-position prediction of saccadic eye movements using a Taylor series.

Authors:  Shuhang Wang; Russell L Woods; Francisco M Costela; Gang Luo
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Nystagmus Does Not Limit Reading Ability in Albinism.

Authors:  Muriel Dysli; Mathias Abegg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Effect of Magnification and Contrast on Reading Performance in Different Types of Simulated Low Vision.

Authors:  Michael Christen; Mathias Abegg
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 0.957

8.  An eye movement study on the role of the visual field defect in pure alexia.

Authors:  Tobias Bormann; Sascha A Wolfer; Wibke Hachmann; Wolf A Lagrèze; Lars Konieczny
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  What's in a name? The characterization of pure alexia.

Authors:  Randi Starrfelt; Tim Shallice
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.