Literature DB >> 22326614

Risk factors of surgical failure following transvaginal mesh repair for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Cheng-Yu Long1, Tsia-Shu Lo, Chiu-Lin Wang, Chin-Hu Wu, Cheng-Min Liu, Juin-Huang Su.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the factors associated with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) recurrence after transvaginal mesh (TVM) repair. STUDY
DESIGN: One hundred and thirteen women with symptomatic POP stage II to IV were scheduled for TVM procedures. All subjects underwent urinalyses and pelvic examination using the POP quantification (POP-Q) staging system before and after surgery.
RESULTS: Seven (6.2%) of 113 women reported POP recurrence after a mean follow-up time of 30 months. We performed a univariate analysis of patients' characteristics to identify the predictors of surgical failure after TVM. There was no difference between two groups as to body mass index, POP stage, mesh type, and preoperative urinary symptoms and urodynamic parameters (P>0.05). However, we found that uterine prolapse (P=0.016) and surgical experience (P=0.043) were two significant predictors of surgical failure. Multivariate logistic regression showed similar results.
CONCLUSION: Advanced uterine prolapse and lack of surgical experience were two significant predictors of failure following TVM. POP recurrence after mesh repair appears to be unlikely beyond the learning curve. Crown
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22326614     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  6 in total

1.  Long-term outcome after transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Pia Heinonen; Riikka Aaltonen; Kirsi Joronen; Seija Ala-Nissilä
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse: International Urogynecological Association Research and Development Committee opinion.

Authors:  Sharif Ismail; Jonathan Duckett; Diaa Rizk; Olanrewaju Sorinola; Dorothy Kammerer-Doak; Oscar Contreras-Ortiz; Hazem Al-Mandeel; Kamil Svabik; Mitesh Parekh; Christian Phillips
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Natural history of pessary use in women aged 65 - 74 versus 75 years and older with pelvic organ prolapse: a 12-year study.

Authors:  Sophie Ramsay; Le Mai Tu; Cara Tannenbaum
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Short-term outcomes of the transvaginal minimal mesh procedure for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Naoko Takazawa; Akiko Fujisaki; Yasukuni Yoshimura; Akira Tsujimura; Shigeo Horie
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2018-02-02

5.  Predictors of Clinical Outcome in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Who Underwent Transvaginal Mesh Reconstruction Surgery.

Authors:  Ting-Hsuan Lin; Fung-Chao Tu; Ho-Hsiung Lin; Sheng-Mou Hsiao
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  Comparison of UpholdTM Vaginal Mesh Procedure with Hysterectomy or Uterine Preservation for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Chin-Ru Ker; Kun-Ling Lin; Zi-Xi Loo; Yung-Shun Juan; Cheng-Yu Long
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.