Literature DB >> 22326545

Biomechanical evaluation of graft fixation techniques for acromioclavicular joint reconstructions using coracoclavicular tendon grafts.

Robert Z Tashjian1, Jodi D Southam, Todd Clevenger, Kent N Bachus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study compared the initial strength of acromioclavicular joint reconstructions using coracoclavicular tendon grafts using interference screws, a tendon square knot, or side-to-side suturing for graft fixation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An acromioclavicular joint reconstruction was performed using a hamstring allograft looped under the coracoid and then fixed using interference screws, a square knot in the graft, and side-to-side graft suturing in each of 8 cadaveric shoulders. Each reconstruction was cycled in a superior direction, and displacements were recorded. Stiffness and ultimate load to failure of the reconstructions were determined.
RESULTS: The knot construct had a greater elongation after cycling compared with the screw (P = .003) or side-to-side suture (P = .001) repairs and had a higher ultimate load to failure than the screw construct (614.9 ± 124.6 vs 469.79 ± 175.1 N; P = .02). No significant differences were found between the screw and side-to-side suture constructs in elongation (P = .11) or ultimate loads to failure (P = .58). Finally, the side-to-side construct was significantly stiffer than the screw (P = .01) or knot (P = .01) reconstructions.
CONCLUSIONS: Clavicular fixation of a coracoclavicular graft during an acromioclavicular joint reconstruction using a square knot has superior ultimate strength compared with interference screw fixation. Side-to-side suture and screw constructs have superior cyclic displacement properties compared with knot fixation, with no differences in cyclic properties found between the side-to-side suture and screw constructs. Side-to-side suturing provides equivalent initial biomechanical strength compared with interference screw fixation.
Copyright © 2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22326545     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.10.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  8 in total

1.  Surgical Technique for Arthroscopy-Assisted Anatomical Reconstruction of Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligaments Using Autologous Hamstring Graft in Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations.

Authors:  Bancha Chernchujit; Prashant Parate
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-05-29

2.  Concomitant Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction with a Duo-Figure-8 Autogenic Graft Wrapping Technique for Treating Chronic Acromioclavicular Separation.

Authors:  Fu-Ting Huang; Kai-Cheng Lin; Chih-Yang Lin; Wei-Ning Chang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-03-09

Review 3.  Nonanatomic and Suture-Based Coracoclavicular Joint Stabilization Techniques Provide Adequate Stability at a Lower Cost of Implants in Biomechanical Studies When Compared With Anatomic Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Theodorakys Marín Fermín; Jean Michel Hovsepian; Víctor Miguel Rodrigues Fernandes; Ioannis Terzidis; Emmanouil Papakostas; Jason Koh
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-24

Review 4.  Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and a biomechanical study of a triple endobutton technique.

Authors:  Qi Li; Pei-ling Hsueh; Yun-feng Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  A Novel Surgical Technique for Fixation of Recurrent Acromioclavicular Dislocations: AC Dog Bone Technique in Combination with Autogenous Semitendinosus Tendon Graft.

Authors:  Patrick Holweg; Wolfgang Pichler; Gerald Gruber; Ellen Tackner; Franz Josef Seibert; Patrick Sadoghi; Gloria Hohenberger
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2017-05-23

6.  Acromioclavicular Joint Stabilization: A Biomechanical Study of Bidirectional Stability and Strength.

Authors:  Patrick Hislop; Kentaro Sakata; David C Ackland; Robert Gotmaker; Matthew C Evans
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-04-17

7.  Clavicular Tunnel Complications after Coracoclavicular Reconstruction in Acute Acromioclavicular Dislocation: Coracoid Loop versus Coracoid Tunnel Fixation.

Authors:  Neunghan Jeon; Nam Hong Choi; Joo Hyung Ha; Myonghwhan Kim; Tae Kang Lim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-02-15

8.  Comparison of Short-term Complications Between 2 Methods of Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Lane N Rush; Nicholas Lake; Eric C Stiefel; Edward R Hobgood; J Randall Ramsey; Michael J O'Brien; Larry D Field; Felix H Savoie
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-07-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.