Literature DB >> 22326425

Biventricular strategies for neonatal critical aortic stenosis: high mortality associated with early reintervention.

Edward J Hickey1, Christopher A Caldarone, Eugene H Blackstone, William G Williams, Tom Yeh, Christian Pizarro, Gary Lofland, Christo I Tchervenkov, Frank Pigula, Brian W McCrindle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the risk of reintervention after biventricular strategies to treat neonatal critical aortic stenosis, and the effect of reintervention on survival.
METHODS: In a multi-institutional inception cohort of 139 neonates, the time-related risk of reintervention was analyzed using parametric multiphase competing-risk models and a modulated renewal repeated-events method. The risk factors were identified through multivariate regression and selected with bootstrap resampling for reliability. Univentricular survival predictions were generated using the Congenital Heart Surgeons' Society Univentricular Repair Survival Advantage score.
RESULTS: One half of survivors required reintervention within 3 years. The risk of undergoing early reintervention decreased with successive procedures (P<.0001); however, second (n=27) and third (n=8) reinterventions were associated with a greater late risk of repeat reintervention compared with the index procedure (P=.02). The morphologic risk factors for earlier reintervention included left ventricular dysfunction, fewer aortic cusps, associated subaortic or arch obstruction, and a larger tricuspid annulus. The risk of death did not improve after successive reinterventions. Therefore, the overall survival for those requiring repeated reinterventions was compromised by the cumulative procedural risk of death. The most important risk factor for death after the first reintervention (P<.01) was a shorter interval from the index biventricular procedure, particularly if less than 30 days. Fifteen neonates required reintervention within 30 days of the index biventricular procedure (9 deaths, 60%). For the same 15 neonates, the survival predictions using published models estimated fewer than one half the number deaths with index univentricular repair strategies (4/15, 27%, P=.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Success of index biventricular procedures has important survival implications: early reintervention implies a poor prognosis and might reflect incorrect management decisions. The morphologic characteristics can help identify such neonates, and univentricular repair might, instead, be preferable.
Copyright © 2012 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22326425     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.09.076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  5 in total

1.  Staged Biventricular Repair-Oriented Strategy in Borderline Biventricular Repair Candidates with Ventricular Septal Defect.

Authors:  Yuki Nakamura; Ikuo Hagino; Hiromichi Nakajima; Mitsuru Aoki
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  The importance of hybrid stage I palliation for neonates with critical aortic stenosis and reduced left ventricular function.

Authors:  Yusuke Misumi; Takaya Hoashi; Koji Kagisaki; Satoshi Yazaki; Masataka Kitano; Kenichi Kurosaki; Isao Shiraishi; Hajime Ichikawa
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 3.  Decision-Making for Surgery in the Management of Patients with Univentricular Heart.

Authors:  Ryan Robert Davies; Christian Pizarro
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.418

4.  The mid-term outcome of primary open valvotomy for critical aortic stenosis in early infancy - a retrospective single center study over 18 years.

Authors:  Claire Galoin-Bertail; André Capderou; Emre Belli; Lucile Houyel
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 5.  The under reporting of recruitment strategies in research with children with life-threatening illnesses: A systematic review.

Authors:  Briony F Hudson; Linda Jm Oostendorp; Bridget Candy; Victoria Vickerstaff; Louise Jones; Monica Lakhanpaul; Myra Bluebond-Langner; Paddy Stone
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.762

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.