BACKGROUND: "Refusal of medical aid" (RMA) is the term commonly used by emergency medical technicians (EMTs) when someone calls 911 for care (usually the patient or a family member) but, after the initial encounter with the EMTs, the patient refuses emergency medical services transport to the hospital. Some intervention may have been performed, such as taking vital signs or an electrocardiogram, before the RMA. Although there have been multiple studies of the characteristics and outcomes of patients who RMA, little analysis has been done of the role of EMTs in these cases. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association between EMT gender and the patient's decision to refuse medical aid in the prehospital setting. METHODS: The study was performed using data from one hospital-based ambulance service in an urban setting that participates in the 911 system. This was a case control study that examined the data from consecutive patients who refused medical aid for a 1-year period compared to a control group of non-RMA patients. RESULTS: There was a significantly higher representation of all-male EMT teams in the RMA group (p<0.0001). Using propensity score-matching methodology to control for other factors, all-male EMT teams were 4.75 times more likely to generate an RMA as compared to all-female and mixed-gender EMT teams (95% confidence interval 1.63-13.96, p=0.0046). CONCLUSION: We found that the gender of the EMTs was one of the most important factors associated with RMA, with a much higher frequency of RMAs occurring when both members of the team were male.
BACKGROUND: "Refusal of medical aid" (RMA) is the term commonly used by emergency medical technicians (EMTs) when someone calls 911 for care (usually the patient or a family member) but, after the initial encounter with the EMTs, the patient refuses emergency medical services transport to the hospital. Some intervention may have been performed, such as taking vital signs or an electrocardiogram, before the RMA. Although there have been multiple studies of the characteristics and outcomes of patients who RMA, little analysis has been done of the role of EMTs in these cases. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association between EMT gender and the patient's decision to refuse medical aid in the prehospital setting. METHODS: The study was performed using data from one hospital-based ambulance service in an urban setting that participates in the 911 system. This was a case control study that examined the data from consecutive patients who refused medical aid for a 1-year period compared to a control group of non-RMA patients. RESULTS: There was a significantly higher representation of all-male EMT teams in the RMA group (p<0.0001). Using propensity score-matching methodology to control for other factors, all-male EMT teams were 4.75 times more likely to generate an RMA as compared to all-female and mixed-gender EMT teams (95% confidence interval 1.63-13.96, p=0.0046). CONCLUSION: We found that the gender of the EMTs was one of the most important factors associated with RMA, with a much higher frequency of RMAs occurring when both members of the team were male.