Literature DB >> 22326105

The impact of birthplace on women's birth experiences and perceptions of care.

Charlotte Overgaard1, Morten Fenger-Grøn, Jane Sandall.   

Abstract

Overall birth experience is an important outcome of birth, and studies of psycho-social birth outcomes and women's perspectives on care are increasingly used to evaluate and develop maternity care services. We examined the influence of birthplace on women's birth experiences and perceptions of care in two freestanding midwifery units (FMU) and two obstetric units (OU) in north Denmark, all pursuing an ideal of high-quality, humanistic and patient-centred care. As part of a matched cohort study, a postal questionnaire survey was undertaken. Two hundred and eighteen low-risk women in FMU care, admitted between January-October 2006, and an obstetrically/socio-demographically matched control group of 218 low-risk women admitted to an OU were invited to participate. Three hundred and seventy-five women (86%) responded. Birth experience and satisfaction with care were rated significantly more positively by FMU than by OU women. Significantly better results for FMU care were also found for specific patient-centred care elements (support, participation in decision-making, attentiveness to psychological needs and to wishes for birth, information, and for women's feeling of being listened to). Adjustment for medical birth factors slightly increased the positive effect of FMU care. Subgroup analysis showed that a significant, negative effect of low education and employment level on birth experience was found only for the OU group. Our results provide strong support of FMU care and underline the big challenges in providing individual and supportive care for all women, especially in OUs. Policy-makers and professionals need to consider how the advantages provided by FMU care can support the effort to improve women's birth experience and possibly also the combat of the negative effect of social disadvantage on health. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22326105     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  18 in total

1.  Freestanding midwifery units versus obstetric units: does the effect of place of birth differ with level of social disadvantage?

Authors:  Charlotte Overgaard; Morten Fenger-Grøn; Jane Sandall
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Satisfaction with childbirth services provided in public health facilities: results from a cross- sectional survey among postnatal women in Chhattisgarh, India.

Authors:  Paridhi Jha; Margareta Larsson; Kyllike Christensson; Agneta Skoog Svanberg
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.640

3.  Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Louise Fischer Christensen; Charlotte Overgaard
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Effects of Birthing Room Design on Maternal and Neonate Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christina Nilsson; Helle Wijk; Lina Höglund; Helen Sjöblom; Eva Hessman; Marie Berg
Journal:  HERD       Date:  2020-02-20

5.  The development of midwifery unit standards for Europe.

Authors:  Juliet Rayment; Lucia Rocca-Ihenacho; Mary Newburn; Ellen Thaels; Laura Batinelli; Christine Mcourt
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.372

6.  Choice in maternity care: associations with unit supply, geographic accessibility and user characteristics.

Authors:  Hugo Pilkington; Béatrice Blondel; Nicolas Drewniak; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.918

7.  Women's experiences of transfer from primary maternity unit to tertiary hospital in New Zealand: part of the prospective cohort Evaluating Maternity Units study.

Authors:  Celia P Grigg; Sally K Tracy; Virginia Schmied; Amy Monk; Mark B Tracy
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 8.  Assessing the performance of maternity care in Europe: a critical exploration of tools and indicators.

Authors:  Ramón Escuriet; Joanna White; Katrien Beeckman; Lucy Frith; Fatima Leon-Larios; Christine Loytved; Ans Luyben; Marlene Sinclair; Edwin van Teijlingen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Barriers and facilitators related to implementation of regulated midwifery in Manitoba: a case study.

Authors:  Kellie Thiessen; Maureen Heaman; Javier Mignone; Patricia Martens; Kristine Robinson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  When choice becomes limited: Women's experiences of delay in labour.

Authors:  Natalie Armstrong; Sara Kenyon
Journal:  Health (London)       Date:  2016-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.