| Literature DB >> 22326018 |
Rony Zachariah1, Nathan Ford, Dermot Maher, Karen Bissell, Rafael Van den Bergh, Wilma van den Boogaard, Tony Reid, Kenneth G Castro, Bertrand Draguez, Johan von Schreeb, Jeremiah Chakaya, Rifat Atun, Christian Lienhardt, Don A Enarson, Anthony D Harries.
Abstract
Operational research in low-income countries has a key role in filling the gap between what we know from research and what we do with that knowledge-the so-called know-do gap, or implementation gap. Planned research that does not tangibly affect policies and practices is ineffective and wasteful, especially in settings where resources are scarce and disease burden is high. Clear parameters are urgently needed to measure and judge the success of operational research. We define operational research and its relation with policy and practice, identify why operational research might fail to affect policy and practice, and offer possible solutions to address these shortcomings. We also propose measures of success for operational research. Adoption and use of these measures could help to ensure that operational research better changes policy and practice and improves health-care delivery and disease programmes.Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22326018 DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70309-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lancet Infect Dis ISSN: 1473-3099 Impact factor: 25.071