H Cox1, N Ford. 1. Médecins Sans Frontières, Khayelitsha, Cape Town, South Africa. hcox@burnet.edu.au
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current treatment for drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) is inadequate, and outcomes are significantly poorer than for drug-susceptible TB, particularly for patients previously treated with second-line drugs, treatment failures or extensively drug-resistant (XDR-) TB patients (complicated DR-TB). Linezolid is not recommended for routine DR-TB treatment due to the lack of efficacy data, but is suggested for patients where adequate second-line regimens are difficult to design. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess existing evidence of efficacy and safety of linezolid for DR-TB treatment. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase and abstracts from World Conferences of The Union for studies published through February 2011. We included all studies in which linezolid was given systematically to DR-TB patients and where treatment outcomes were reported. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies were included in our review, representing 148 patients. The pooled proportion for treatment success was 67.99% (95%CI 58.00-78.99, τ2 129.42). There were no significant differences in success comparing daily linezolid dose (≤600 vs. >600 mg) and mean linezolid duration (≤7 vs. >7 months). The pooled estimate for the frequency of any adverse events was 61.48% (95%CI 40.15-82.80), with 36.23% (95%CI 20.67-51.79) discontinuing linezolid due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: Treatment success with linezolid was equal to or better than that commonly achieved for uncomplicated DR-TB, and better than previous reports for previously treated patients and those with XDR-TB. While data are limited, linezolid appears be a useful drug, albeit associated with significant adverse events, and should be considered in the treatment of complicated DR-TB.
BACKGROUND: Current treatment for drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) is inadequate, and outcomes are significantly poorer than for drug-susceptible TB, particularly for patients previously treated with second-line drugs, treatment failures or extensively drug-resistant (XDR-) TBpatients (complicated DR-TB). Linezolid is not recommended for routine DR-TB treatment due to the lack of efficacy data, but is suggested for patients where adequate second-line regimens are difficult to design. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess existing evidence of efficacy and safety of linezolid for DR-TB treatment. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase and abstracts from World Conferences of The Union for studies published through February 2011. We included all studies in which linezolid was given systematically to DR-TBpatients and where treatment outcomes were reported. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies were included in our review, representing 148 patients. The pooled proportion for treatment success was 67.99% (95%CI 58.00-78.99, τ2 129.42). There were no significant differences in success comparing daily linezolid dose (≤600 vs. >600 mg) and mean linezolid duration (≤7 vs. >7 months). The pooled estimate for the frequency of any adverse events was 61.48% (95%CI 40.15-82.80), with 36.23% (95%CI 20.67-51.79) discontinuing linezolid due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: Treatment success with linezolid was equal to or better than that commonly achieved for uncomplicated DR-TB, and better than previous reports for previously treated patients and those with XDR-TB. While data are limited, linezolid appears be a useful drug, albeit associated with significant adverse events, and should be considered in the treatment of complicated DR-TB.
Authors: Adrian Rendon; Simon Tiberi; Anna Scardigli; Lia D'Ambrosio; Rosella Centis; Jose A Caminero; Giovanni Battista Migliori Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Xin Zhang; Matthew E Falagas; Konstantinos Z Vardakas; Rui Wang; Rong Qin; Jin Wang; Youning Liu Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Jennifer J Furin; Jeannine Du Bois; Elana van Brakel; Phalkun Chheng; Amour Venter; Charles A Peloquin; Abdullah Alsultan; Bonnie A Thiel; Sara M Debanne; W Henry Boom; Andreas H Diacon; John L Johnson Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: D H Vu; M S Bolhuis; R A Koster; B Greijdanus; W C M de Lange; R van Altena; J R B J Brouwers; D R A Uges; J W C Alffenaar Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-08-27 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: V Balasubramanian; S Solapure; H Iyer; A Ghosh; S Sharma; P Kaur; R Deepthi; V Subbulakshmi; V Ramya; V Ramachandran; M Balganesh; L Wright; D Melnick; S L Butler; V K Sambandamurthy Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2013-11-04 Impact factor: 5.191