Literature DB >> 22325333

Window replacement and residential lead paint hazard control 12 years later.

Sherry L Dixon1, David E Jacobs, Jonathan W Wilson, Judith Y Akoto, Rick Nevin, C Scott Clark.   

Abstract

Window replacement is a key method of reducing childhood lead exposure, but the long-term effectiveness has not been previously evaluated. Windows have the highest levels of interior lead paint and dust compared to other building components. Our objective was to conduct a follow-up study of residential window replacement and lead hazard control 12 years after homes were enrolled in an evaluation of the HUD Lead Hazard Control Grant Program, sampling settled lead dust in housing in four cities (n=189 homes). Previous work evaluated lead hazard controls up to 6 years after intervention using dust lead measurements and two years after intervention using both dust and blood lead data. But the earlier work could not examine the effect of window replacement over the longer time period examined here: 12 years. The individual homes were assigned to one of three categories, based on how many windows had been replaced: all replacement, some replacement, or non-replacement. Windows that were not replaced were repaired. We controlled for covariates such as site, housing condition, presence of lead paint, and season using longitudinal regression modeling. Adjusted floor and sill dust lead geometric mean dust lead loadings declined at least 85% from pre-intervention to 12 years after the intervention for homes with all replacement windows, some windows replaced and no windows replaced. Twelve years after intervention, homes with all replacement windows had 41% lower interior floor dust lead, compared to non-replacement homes (1.4 versus 2.4 μg/ft2, p<0.001), and window sill dust lead was 51% lower (25 versus 52 μg/ft2, p=0.006) while controlling for covariates. Homes with some windows replaced had interior floor and window sill dust lead loadings that were 28% (1.7 versus 2.4 μg/ft2, p=0.19) and 37% (33 versus 52 μg/ft2, p=0.07) lower, respectively, compared to non-replacement homes. The net economic benefit of window replacement compared to window repair (non-replacement) is $1700-$2000 per housing unit. Homes in which all windows were replaced had significantly lower lead dust. New windows are also likely to reduce energy use and improve home value. Lead-safe window replacement is an important element of lead hazard control, weatherization, renovation and housing investment strategies and should be implemented broadly to protect children. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22325333     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2012.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  8 in total

1.  Findings from the Initial Use of the Healthy Homes Rating System (HHRS) in Three American Cities.

Authors:  Katelyn Burkart; Jonatan Martinez; Alicia Streater; Lyke Thompson
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Call for an accurate historical account of childhood lead poisoning prevention.

Authors:  David E Jacobs
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Calls for removing all lead paint from US housing are misguided.

Authors:  Don Ryan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Household interventions for preventing domestic lead exposure in children.

Authors:  Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit; Berlinda Yeoh; Ursula Griebler; Lisa M Pfadenhauer; Laura K Busert; Stefan K Lhachimi; Szimonetta Lohner; Gerald Gartlehner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-16

Review 5.  A Systematic Review of Health Economic Analyses of Housing Improvement Interventions and Insecticide-Treated Bednets in the Home.

Authors:  Frank Pega; Nick Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Interrupted time series analysis of children's blood lead levels: A case study of lead hazard control program in Syracuse, New York.

Authors:  Liyang Shao; Lianjun Zhang; Zhen Zhen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Assessing the effect of four types of direct mail messages to promote the uptake of residential lead remediation funds.

Authors:  H Okatch; B Nkala; J Beltrami; E Poy; D Parmer; J Nkala; F Olawole
Journal:  Public Health Pract (Oxf)       Date:  2022-09-23

8.  Household interventions for secondary prevention of domestic lead exposure in children.

Authors:  Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit; Verena Mayr; Andreea Iulia Dobrescu; Gernot Wagner; Andrea Chapman; Lisa M Pfadenhauer; Szimonetta Lohner; Stefan K Lhachimi; Laura K Busert; Gerald Gartlehner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-10-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.