Literature DB >> 22324817

Identification of adducts between an odoriferous volatile thiol and oxidized grape phenolic compounds: kinetic study of adduct formation under chemical and enzymatic oxidation conditions.

Maria Nikolantonaki1, Michael Jourdes, Kentaro Shinoda, Pierre-Louis Teissedre, Stéphane Quideau, Philippe Darriet.   

Abstract

HPLC-MS and (1)H, (13)C, and 2D NMR analyses were used to identify new addition products between 3-sulfanylhexan-1-ol (3SH) and o-quinones derived from (+)-catechin, (-)-epicatechin, and caftaric acid. The kinetics of formation of these adducts were monitored in a wine model solution and in a must-like medium by HPLC-UV-MS with the aim of understanding the chemical mechanism involved in reactions between volatile thiols and o-quinones. One o-quinone-caftaric acid/3SH adduct, three o-quinone-(+)-catechin/3SH adducts, and three o-quinone-(-)-epicatechin/3SH adducts were characterized. Caftaric acid was oxidized faster than (-)-epicatechin and (+)-catechin when these phenolic compounds were incubated in a one-component mixture with polyphenoloxidase (PPO) in the presence of 3SH. Consequently, o-quinone-caftaric acid formed adducts with 3SH more rapidly than o-quinone-(+)-catechin and o-quinone-(-)-epicatechin in the absence of other nucleophilic species. Furthermore, o-quinone-(-)-epicatechin reacted faster than o-quinone-(+)-catechin with 3SH. Sulfur dioxide decreased the yield of adduct formation to a significant extent. Under chemical oxidation conditions, the rates and yields of adduct formation were lower than those observed in the presence of PPO, and o-quinone-caftaric acid was slightly less reactive with 3SH, compared to oxidized flavan-3-ols. The identification of o-quinone-caftaric acid/3SH and o-quinone-(+)-catechin/3SH adducts in a must matrix suggests that the proposed reaction mechanism is responsible for 3SH loss in dry wines during their vinification and aging process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22324817     DOI: 10.1021/jf204295s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  3 in total

Review 1.  NMR in the Service of Wine Differentiation.

Authors:  Marko Viskić; Luna Maslov Bandić; Ana-Marija Jagatić Korenika; Ana Jeromel
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-01-08

2.  Formation of Hydrogen Sulfide in Wine: Interactions between Copper and Sulfur Dioxide.

Authors:  Marlize Z Bekker; Mark E Smith; Paul A Smith; Eric N Wilkes
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Molecular Characterization of White Wines Antioxidant Metabolome by Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Remy Romanet; Florian Bahut; Maria Nikolantonaki; Régis D Gougeon
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.