Literature DB >> 22324783

Reflectance confocal microscopy in the diagnosis of partially and completely amelanotic melanoma: report on seven cases.

T Maier1, E C Sattler, M Braun-Falco, H C Korting, T Ruzicka, C Berking.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical diagnosis of amelanotic melanoma is often challenging, because the classical clinical and dermoscopic features of pigmented melanoma are usually missing. The reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) offers an additional possibility of an in vivo diagnosis of both pigmented and amelanotic melanoma lesions.
OBJECTIVES: To test the value of RCM in vivo in the preoperative prediction of melanoma lesions lacking significant pigment and to compare the results with the evaluation by dermoscopy and histopathology.
METHODS: We examined seven patients with the clinically uncertain differential diagnosis of partially or completely amelanotic melanoma by RCM and dermoscopy prior to surgical excision of the lesions according to the previously suggested dermoscopy algorithm and RCM score for melanoma. The following RCM features were evaluated: major criteria scored +2 (non-edged papillae, cytological atypia at the dermo-epidermal junction) and minor criteria +1 (roundish pagetoid cells, widespread pagetoid infiltration, nucleated cells within dermal papillae, cerebriform cell clusters). The dermoscopic evaluation included the following criteria: polymorphous vessels, dotted and linear irregular vessels, hairpin vessels, pink-erythematous colour, milky red areas, irregularly shaped depigmentation, blue-grey dots and subtle pigmentation.
RESULTS: The preoperative in vivo RCM analysis revealed common features of melanoma also found in pigmented melanoma lesions. All lesions showed a score above three in the applied RCM algorithm which was proposed earlier as the threshold for malignancy. In dermoscopy, five of seven lesions showed characteristic vascular changes.
CONCLUSION: In vivo RCM is a valuable tool in the preoperative diagnosis of partially and completely amelanotic tumours suspicious for melanoma in addition to dermoscopic evaluation.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology © 2012 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22324783     DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04465.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol        ISSN: 0926-9959            Impact factor:   6.166


  12 in total

1.  Impact of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy on the number needed to treat melanoma in doubtful lesions.

Authors:  I Alarcon; C Carrera; J Palou; L Alos; J Malvehy; S Puig
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 9.302

2.  Correlation of histological and ex-vivo confocal tumor thickness in malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Daniela Hartmann; Sebastian Krammer; Cristel Ruini; Thomas Ruzicka; Tanja von Braunmühl
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 3.  [Ex vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy for melanocytic lesions and autoimmune diseases].

Authors:  D Hartmann
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 0.751

4.  Meibomian Glands or Not? Identification of In Vivo and Ex Vivo Confocal Microscopy Features and Histological Correlates in the Eyelid Margin.

Authors:  Yu-Jing Wang; Min Ke
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 5.  [Confocal laser scanning microscopy].

Authors:  M Ulrich
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 0.751

6.  Reflectance confocal microscopy terminology glossary for melanocytic skin lesions: A systematic review.

Authors:  Cristian Navarrete-Dechent; Konstantinos Liopyris; Jilliana Monnier; Saud Aleissa; Lindsay M Boyce; Caterina Longo; Margaret Oliviero; Harold Rabinovitz; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Allan C Halpern; Giovanni Pellacani; Alon Scope; Manu Jain
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 11.527

7.  Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma in adults.

Authors:  Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Daniel Saleh; Naomi Chuchu; Susan E Bayliss; Lopa Patel; Clare Davenport; Yemisi Takwoingi; Kathie Godfrey; Rubeta N Matin; Rakesh Patalay; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04

8.  Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults.

Authors:  Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Naomi Chuchu; Daniel Saleh; Susan E Bayliss; Yemisi Takwoingi; Clare Davenport; Lopa Patel; Rubeta N Matin; Colette O'Sullivan; Rakesh Patalay; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04

9.  Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopically Equivocal Pink Cutaneous Lesions with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Telemedicine Settings: Double Reader Concordance Evaluation of 316 Cases.

Authors:  J Łudzik; A M Witkowski; I Roterman-Konieczna; S Bassoli; F Farnetani; G Pellacani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  "Twin lesions": Which one is the bad one? Improvement of clinical diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Secil Saral; Daniela Hartmann; Valerie Letulè; Thomas Ruzicka; Cristel Ruini; Tanja von Braunmühl
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2017-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.